Desnudar la razón evaluadora: elementos para un combate filosófico-educativo

Otros responsables
Fecha
01/2020
Editorial
Universidad Pontificia Comillas
Revista
Pensamiento
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0031-4749
eISSN
2386-5822
ISBN
Idioma
Español
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Estas páginas esbozan algunas claves de investigación que buscan trazar un horizonte interpretativo a propósito de una crítica de la razón evaluadora y sus implicancias ético-políticas en educación. De aquí la necesidad de analizar las relaciones de dicho tipo de racionalidad con la alteridad, preguntándonos por sus lugares y efectos en los procesos educativos. Por ello se propone una primera definición de esta racionalidad, para luego caracterizarla y profundizarla críticamente, lo cual permitirá identificar distintas formas de plantearse el problema de la evaluación (del otro) —históricamente abordado desde miradas ajenas al campo de la filosofía de la educación y de la ética como ramas de la filosofía práctica—. Nuestro planteo pone en cuestión las retóricas técnicas, psico-didácticas o sociológico-pedagógicas, que hace siglos se preguntan cuál sería la mejor forma de evaluar o directamente coadyuvan a naturalizar la razón evaluadora. Finalmente, intentamos pensar gestos micro-políticos de una potencial educación no-evaluadora y, por tanto, no-fascista.
These pages outline some research keys that seek to draw an interpretive horizon in relation to a critique of evaluative reason and its ethical-political implications in education. Hence the need to analyze the relationships of this type of rationality with otherness, asking us about their places and effects on educational processes. Therefore, a first definition of this rationality is proposed, in order to then characterize and deepen it critically, which will allow us to identify different ways of approaching the evaluation problem (of the other) —historically approached from views alien to the field of philosophy of education and of ethics as branches of practical philosophy. Our proposal calls into question the technical, psycho-didactic or sociological-pedagogical rhetoric’s, which for centuries has been asking what would be the best way to evaluate or directly helped to naturalize the evaluating reason. Finally, we try to think of micro-political gestures of a potential non-evaluative education and, therefore, non-fascist.
These pages outline some research keys that seek to draw an interpretive horizon in relation to a critique of evaluative reason and its ethical-political implications in education. Hence the need to analyze the relationships of this type of rationality with otherness, asking us about their places and effects on educational processes. Therefore, a first definition of this rationality is proposed, in order to then characterize and deepen it critically, which will allow us to identify different ways of approaching the evaluation problem (of the other) —historically approached from views alien to the field of philosophy of education and of ethics as branches of practical philosophy. Our proposal calls into question the technical, psycho-didactic or sociological-pedagogical rhetoric’s, which for centuries has been asking what would be the best way to evaluate or directly helped to naturalize the evaluating reason. Finally, we try to think of micro-political gestures of a potential non-evaluative education and, therefore, non-fascist.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-nd
