Microhabitat scale drives fungal community structure in a viticultural landscape

Volver a la Vista simple
dc.conicet.datoinvestigacionid38221
dc.conicet.justificacion
dc.conicet.linkAdjuntosigeva_files/POSTULANTE/27349288090/DATO/38213/datos_hongos_filtrado_abund.csv
dc.conicet.localizacionjson{"referencia":[{"id":"","nombre":"LAE","padre":"","geoJSON":"","tipo":"PUNTO","formato":"1","latitud":"-33.815166","longitud":"-69.196897 ","puntosPoligonoList":[]},{"id":"","nombre":"ALH","padre":"","geoJSON":"","tipo":"PUNTO","formato":"1","latitud":"-33.787692","longitud":"-69.164889 ","puntosPoligonoList":[]},{"id":"","nombre":"LCA","padre":"","geoJSON":"","tipo":"PUNTO","formato":"1","latitud":" -33.749931","longitud":"-69.190588","puntosPoligonoList":[]},{"id":"","nombre":"MDU","padre":"","geoJSON":"","tipo":"PUNTO","formato":"1","latitud":"-33.609441","longitud":"-69.193511 ","puntosPoligonoList":[]},{"id":"","nombre":"LC","padre":"","geoJSON":"","tipo":"PUNTO","formato":"1","latitud":"-33.75134","longitud":"-69.18088","puntosPoligonoList":[]},{"id":"","nombre":"LI","padre":"","geoJSON":"","tipo":"PUNTO","formato":"1","latitud":"-33.614407","longitud":"-69.26043 ","puntosPoligonoList":[]}]}
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.conicet.paisOrganizacionArgentina
dc.datacite.CreatorFruitos, Andrea Beatríz
dc.datacite.CreatorSantos, Micaela
dc.datacite.CreatorPascual Tudanca, María Paula
dc.datacite.Creatorde la Cruz Lopez, David Jose
dc.datacite.CreatorRoy, Mélanie
dc.datacite.DateTypeRecolectado
dc.datacite.DescriptionTypeMétodos
dc.datacite.FunderNameORGANIZACIÓN INTERNACIONAL DEL VINO (OIV)
dc.datacite.FunderNameSOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE UNDERGROUND NETWORKS
dc.datacite.FunderNameINSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT (IRD)
dc.datacite.FunderNameMISSION POUR LES INITIATIVES TRANSVERSES ET INTERDISCIP
dc.datacite.FundingReference
dc.datacite.FundingReference
dc.datacite.FundingReference
dc.datacite.FundingReference
dc.datacite.PublicationYear2026
dc.datacite.affiliationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas
dc.datacite.affiliationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas
dc.datacite.affiliationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas
dc.datacite.affiliationConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas
dc.datacite.affiliationInstituto Franco-argentino Sobre Estudios del Clima y Sus Impactos.
dc.datacite.awardTitle
dc.datacite.awardTitle
dc.datacite.awardTitle
dc.datacite.awardTitle
dc.datacite.date10/2024-02/2025
dc.datacite.descriptionWe conducted monthly paired sampling in the six vineyards and their adjacent natural habitat fragments from October 2024 to February 2025. Each vineyard and its adjacent natural habitat fragment were considered a paired site, resulting in six paired sites. Within each paired site, we distinguished two habitats: vineyard and natural habitat fragment. In the vineyard habitat, the sampling location was established within the cultivated area, 100 m from the natural fragment edge toward the vineyard interior. In the natural habitat, the sampling location was established at the centroid of the corresponding fragment. For both, we delimited a 30 × 30 m plot to maximize sampling coverage (Chen et al., 2026). We sampled different fungal reservoirs within each habitat. In both vineyards and natural habitat fragments, we collected soil, bark, and wild flowers. In vineyards, we additionally collected grapevine flowers and mature grape berries (Vitis vinifera cv. Malbec). Thus, the sampling design comprised eight habitat–reservoir combinations across the six paired sites: three reservoirs in natural habitat fragments —soil, bark, and wild flowers— and five reservoirs in vineyards —soil, bark, wild flowers, grapevine flowers, and grapes—. This resulted in 48 site-by-reservoir combinations (8 reservoirs × 6 paired sites), which were sampled monthly when the corresponding reservoir was available. Vine flowers were collected during the December sampling and grapes during February, whereas no fruits of native plants were available for sampling in the natural habitat fragments during that month. For soil sampling, we collected five subsamples at the four corners and the center of the 30 × 30 m plot in both the vineyard and natural habitat of each site at a depth of 10–20 cm and combined them into one composite sample of approximately 500 g. For bark sampling, in natural habitat fragments we collected five bark pieces from each shrub and tree species present, whereas in vineyards we collected five bark pieces exclusively from grapevines. For wild flowers, we collected five flowers from each flowering plant species present in both habitats. In vineyards, we additionally collected a maximum of 10 grapevine flowers and 10 mature grape berries. All samples were placed in sterile, hermetically sealed plastic bags and stored at approximately 4°C in refrigerated containers until transport to the laboratory, where they were frozen at −20°C. From each composite soil sample, we collected a 15 g subsample, which was stored in Falcon tubes and frozen alongside the other reservoir samples for subsequent molecular analyses. To minimize cross-contamination, we wore disposable gloves during sampling and replaced them between sites and reservoir types. All field sampling tools were immersed in a 2% chlorine solution for one minute to render contaminating DNA non-amplifiable (de Silva Wijeyeratne and Gweon, 2025). Before collecting soil at each sampling location, the tools were additionally rinsed with soil from the corresponding site.
dc.datacite.languageenges_ES
dc.datacite.publisherConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
dc.datacite.resourceTypeGeneraldataset
dc.datacite.subjectEcologíaes_ES
dc.datacite.subjectCIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTASes_ES
dc.datacite.subjectCiencias Biológicases_ES
dc.datacite.version1.0es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-29T12:01:03Z
dc.date.updated2026-10-29T11:45:36Z
dc.description.abstractThis dataset is associated with the article entitled “Microhabitat scale drives fungal community structure in a viticultural landscape”. It contains fungal Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) data derived from environmental DNA metabarcoding. Each row represents an OTU record for a given sample and includes taxonomic identification, DNA sequence, functional annotations, sample metadata, and OTU abundance. Taxonomic information includes the best database match and identity, as well as taxonomic classifications at different ranks. Functional annotations include growth form, guild, and trophic mode. Sample metadata identify the site, habitat type, sampling reservoir, and landscape context. Samples were collected from five reservoirs: soil, bark, wildflowers, grape flowers, and grape berries. Soil, bark, and wildflowers were sampled in both vineyards and adjacent Monte Desert habitat fragments, whereas grape flowers and grape berries were sampled exclusively in vineyards.es_ES
dc.description.filFil: Fruitos, Andrea Beatríz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Santos, Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Pascual Tudanca, María Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: de la Cruz Lopez, David Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina
dc.description.filFil: Roy, Mélanie. Instituto Franco-argentino Sobre Estudios del Clima y Sus Impactos.; Argentina
dc.identifier.citationFruitos, Andrea Beatríz; Santos, Micaela; Pascual Tudanca, María Paula; de la Cruz Lopez, David Jose; Roy, Mélanie; (2026): Microhabitat scale drives fungal community structure in a viticultural landscape. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. (dataset). http://hdl.handle.net/11336/299908
dc.identifier.institucionalCONICET
dc.identifier.repoCONICET Digital
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/299908
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject.keywordfungal communityes_ES
dc.subject.keywordvineyardses_ES
dc.subject.keywordmonte desertes_ES
dc.subject.keywordenvironmental DNAes_ES
dc.subject.keywordhabitat fragmentationes_ES
dc.titleMicrohabitat scale drives fungal community structure in a viticultural landscapees_ES
dc.typedataset

Archivos

ARCHIVO
NOTAS DE USO
TAMAÑO
 
datos_hongos_filtrado_abund.csv
2.81 MB
 
Descargar todo
Solo metadatos (JSON)Solo metadatos (XML)
Preparando la descarga 0%
 

Colecciones

Datos de Investigación(CCT - MENDOZA)
Datos de Investigación(IADIZA)
Volver a la Vista simple