Species turnover does not rescue biodiversity in fragmented landscapes
; Bernardo, Enrico
; Chiarello, Adriano G. ; Faria, Deborah ; Gibb, Heloise
; de Lima, Marcelo G. ; Magnago, Luiz F. S. ; Mariano Neto, Eduardo ; Nogueira, André A. ; Nemésio, André ; Passamani, Marcelo ; Pinho, Bruno X. ; Rocha Santos, Larissa ; Rodrigues, Rodolpho C. ; Hissa Safar, Nathalia Vieira ; Santos, Bráulio A. ; Soto Werschitz, Alejandra ; Tabarelli, Marcelo ; Uehara Prado, Marcio ; Vasconcelos, Heraldo L. ; Vieira, Simone ; Sanders, Nathan J. Otros responsables
Fecha
2025-03-12
Editorial
Nature Publishing Group
Revista
Nature
Título del libro
Nombre del evento
Fecha del evento
Institución organizadora
ISSN
0028-0836
eISSN
ISBN
Idioma
Inglés
Tipo del evento
Clasificación temática
Palabras clave
Resumen
Habitat fragmentation generally reduces biodiversity at the patch scale (α diversity). However, there is ongoing debate about whether such negative effects can be alleviated at the landscape scale (γ diversity) if among-patch diversity (β diversity) increases as a result of fragmentation. This controversial view has not been rigorously tested. Here we use a dataset of 4,006 taxa across 37 studies from 6 continents to test the effects of fragmentation on biodiversity across scales by explicitly comparing continuous and fragmented landscapes. We find that fragmented landscapes consistently have both lower α diversity and lower γ diversity. Although fragmented landscapes did tend to have higher β diversity, this did not translate into higher γ diversity. Our findings refute claims that habitat fragmentation can increase biodiversity at landscape scales, and emphasize the need to restore habitat and increase connectivity to minimize biodiversity loss at ever-increasing scales.
Colecciones
Aprobación
Revisión
Complementado por
Referenciado por
Licencia Creative Commons
Excepto donde se indique lo contrario, la licencia de este ítem se describe como by-nc-sa
