Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Rosenthal, Victor Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Udwadia, Farokh Earch
dc.contributor.author
Kumar, Siva
dc.contributor.author
Poojary, Aruna
dc.contributor.author
Sankar, Rathi
dc.contributor.author
Orellano, Pablo Wenceslao
dc.contributor.author
Durgad, Shilpa
dc.contributor.author
Thulasiraman, Mahendran
dc.contributor.author
Bahirune, Shweta
dc.contributor.author
Kumbhar, Shubhangi
dc.contributor.author
Patil, Priyanka
dc.date.available
2020-02-13T20:45:28Z
dc.date.issued
2015-10
dc.identifier.citation
Rosenthal, Victor Daniel; Udwadia, Farokh Earch; Kumar, Siva; Poojary, Aruna; Sankar, Rathi; et al.; Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of split-septum and single-use prefilled flushing device vs 3-way stopcock on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in India: A randomized clinical trial conducted by the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC); Mosby-Elsevier; American Journal Of Infection Control; 43; 10; 10-2015; 1040-1045
dc.identifier.issn
0196-6553
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97495
dc.description.abstract
Background Three-way stopcocks (3WSCs) are open systems used on intravenous tubing. Split septums (SSs) are closed systems with prepierced septums. Single-use prefilled flushing devices (SUFs) carry a lower risk of contamination than standard intravenous flushing. 3WSC and standard flushing are widely used in developing countries. This is the first randomized clinical trial (RCT) to compare rates of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) between patients using an SS + SUF and those using a 3WSC. Methods An RCT with 1096 patients in 5 adult intensive care units was conducted between April 2012 and August 2014 to evaluate their impact on CLABSI rates. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Healthcare Safety Network definitions were applied and International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium methodology were followed. Results The study cohort included 547 patients and 3619 central line (CL)-days for the SS + SUF group, and 549 patients and 4061 CL-days for the 3WSC group. CLABSI rates were 2.21 per 1000 CL-days for SS + SUF and 6.40 per 1000 CL-days for 3WSC (relative risk, 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.76; P =.006). The SS + SUF group had significantly better cumulative infection-free catheter survival compared with the 3WSC group (hazard ration, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.73; P =.006). Using an SS + SUF represents savings of $402.88 and an increase in quality-adjusted life years of 0.0008 per patient. For each extra dollar invested in an SS + SUF, $124 was saved. Conclusion The use of SS + SUF is cost-effective and associated with a significantly lower CLABSI rate compared with the use of 3WSC.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Mosby-Elsevier
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
BACTEREMIA
dc.subject
CATHETER-RELATED INFECTION
dc.subject
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
dc.subject
HEALTH CARE-ACQUIRED INFECTION
dc.subject
HOSPITAL INFECTION
dc.subject
INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
dc.subject
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
dc.subject
SINGLE-USE PREFILLED FLUSHING DEVICE
dc.subject
SPLIT SEPTUM
dc.subject
THREE-WAY STOPCOCK
dc.subject.classification
Otras Medicina Clínica
dc.subject.classification
Medicina Clínica
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
dc.title
Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of split-septum and single-use prefilled flushing device vs 3-way stopcock on central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in India: A randomized clinical trial conducted by the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-12-27T14:04:43Z
dc.journal.volume
43
dc.journal.number
10
dc.journal.pagination
1040-1045
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rosenthal, Victor Daniel. Comunidad Científica Internacional de Control de Infecciones Nosocomiales; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Udwadia, Farokh Earch. Breach Candy Hospital Trust; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kumar, Siva. Kovai Medical Center and Hospital; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Poojary, Aruna. Breach Candy Hospital Trust; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sankar, Rathi. Kovai Medical Center and Hospital; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Orellano, Pablo Wenceslao. Comunidad Científica Internacional de Control de Infecciones Nosocomiales; Argentina. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional San Nicolás; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Durgad, Shilpa. Breach Candy Hospital Trust; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Thulasiraman, Mahendran. Kovai Medical Center and Hospital; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bahirune, Shweta. Breach Candy Hospital Trust; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kumbhar, Shubhangi. Breach Candy Hospital Trust; India
dc.description.fil
Fil: Patil, Priyanka. Breach Candy Hospital Trust; India
dc.journal.title
American Journal Of Infection Control
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655315006550
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.05.042
Archivos asociados