Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Frene, Juan Pablo  
dc.contributor.author
Bacigaluppo, Silvina  
dc.contributor.author
Maury, Mariana  
dc.contributor.author
Ortiz, Jimena  
dc.contributor.author
Rivarola, Maximo Lisandro  
dc.contributor.author
Salvagiotti, Fernando  
dc.contributor.author
Faggioli, Valeria Soledad  
dc.date.available
2025-01-14T13:03:44Z  
dc.date.issued
2024-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Frene, Juan Pablo; Bacigaluppo, Silvina; Maury, Mariana; Ortiz, Jimena; Rivarola, Maximo Lisandro; et al.; Crop-specific response of soil prokaryotic community to long-term intensification management: the importance of crop phase at sampling; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Agronomy; 6; 12-2024; 1-14  
dc.identifier.issn
2673-3218  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/252497  
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: The ecosystem services provided by soil microbial communities are critical for the resilience of agroecosystems, ensuring environmental conservation and food security. Long-term experiments comparing contrasting crop rotations are valuable tools for monitoring microbial responses, but they rarely include all crop phases within a single year. Therefore, the long-term agronomic impact may be masked by the immediate effect of the crop evaluated. In this study, we compared different crop rotations based on the Intensification Sequence Index (ISI), which considers the soil occupation time, and analyzed the impact of cover crops and two nitrogen fertilization strategies.Material and methods: We used an experiment initiated in 2006 with the following crop rotations: Soybean-Soybean, Maize-Wheat/Soybean, and Maize-Soybean-Wheat/Soybean. Soil samples were taken after the harvest of each summer crop phase (i.e., Soybean, Maize, Wheat/Soybean), and the soil prokaryotic community was monitored using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Results and discussion: We observed that ISI and crop phase were the main predictors of microbial community composition, explaining 14.7% and 13.0% of the variation, respectively. Nitrogen fertilization had a minor effect (3.12%) and was detected only after maize sampling; cover crops had no significant effect. However, the presence of cover crops showed higher alpha diversity and an increased abundance of Proteobacteria. Maize enriched the abundance of certain taxa of Planctomycetes and Verrucomicrobia, while Soybean increased the abundance of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. Comparatively, Soybean enriched Mucilaginibacter and Geobacter, while Wheat/Soybean enriched Brevundimonas and Roseimicrobium.Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that crop phase is as important as the long-term legacy of crop rotations in shaping the microbial community and that specific taxa responses are highly dependent on the crop phase surveyed.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Frontiers Media  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
soil microbiome  
dc.subject
maize  
dc.subject
soybean  
dc.subject
cover crops  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Crop-specific response of soil prokaryotic community to long-term intensification management: the importance of crop phase at sampling  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2025-01-13T12:19:46Z  
dc.journal.volume
6  
dc.journal.pagination
1-14  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Frene, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Córdoba. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bacigaluppo, Silvina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maury, Mariana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Córdoba. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ortiz, Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Córdoba. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rivarola, Maximo Lisandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación En Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas. Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Faggioli, Valeria Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Córdoba. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Frontiers in Agronomy  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fagro.2024.1446404/full  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2024.1446404