Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Romano Armada, Neli  
dc.contributor.author
Rajal, Verónica Beatriz  
dc.contributor.other
Siddiqui, Sazada  
dc.contributor.other
Meghvansi, Mukesh Kumar  
dc.contributor.other
Chaudhary, Kamal Kishore  
dc.date.available
2024-02-09T11:35:54Z  
dc.date.issued
2022  
dc.identifier.citation
Romano Armada, Neli; Rajal, Verónica Beatriz; Following the steps towards glyphosate bioremediation. How close are we to field success?; Springer Cham; 2022; 127-143  
dc.identifier.isbn
978-3-030-96999-8  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226531  
dc.description.abstract
Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) are used in agriculture either for cropping glyphosate-resistant species or to control weeds in various crops, from herbaceous plants like tomatoes to trees such as vines and even forest plantations. Their extensive use exposes the land surface and water bodies to the herbicide, posing a risk to non-target organisms worldwide. GBH’s are broken down in the environment by the whole soil or water microbiome. There is incomplete understanding of different bacterial groups´ roles in this process Although not every single species can be isolated, its functional profile or metabolism counts. A species can be removed from the ensemble without a major negative impact on the overall process, as long as other microorganisms perform that same function. We currently have some insight into what single bacteria do when degrading glyphosate. In fact, the classic approach for bioremediation consists of isolating and studying the removal potential of single type of microorganism. Using this approach, investigators have identified the aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) and sarcosine pathway as a primary route of glyphosate breakdown. However, there remains a need for a glyphosate removal strategy that mimics natural microbiomes’ action to avoid glyphosate pseudo persistence by accumulation in the environment.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer Cham  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
PSEUDO-PERSISTENT  
dc.subject
SYNTHETIC COMMUNITY  
dc.subject
HORMESIS  
dc.subject
MICROBIOME  
dc.subject.classification
Bioremediación, Diagnóstico Biotecnológico en Gestión Medioambiental  
dc.subject.classification
Biotecnología del Medio Ambiente  
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS  
dc.title
Following the steps towards glyphosate bioremediation. How close are we to field success?  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro  
dc.date.updated
2023-07-07T20:08:45Z  
dc.journal.pagination
127-143  
dc.journal.pais
Suiza  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Romano Armada, Neli. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rajal, Verónica Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ingeniería. Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97000-0  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97000-0_5  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-97000-0_5  
dc.conicet.paginas
541  
dc.source.titulo
Pesticides and Bioremediation