Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Capítulo de Libro

Following the steps towards glyphosate bioremediation. How close are we to field success?

Título del libro: Pesticides and Bioremediation

Romano Armada, NeliIcon ; Rajal, Verónica BeatrizIcon
Otros responsables: Siddiqui, Sazada; Meghvansi, Mukesh Kumar; Chaudhary, Kamal Kishore
Fecha de publicación: 2022
Editorial: Springer Cham
ISBN: 978-3-030-96999-8
Idioma: Inglés
Clasificación temática:
Bioremediación, Diagnóstico Biotecnológico en Gestión Medioambiental

Resumen

Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH) are used in agriculture either for cropping glyphosate-resistant species or to control weeds in various crops, from herbaceous plants like tomatoes to trees such as vines and even forest plantations. Their extensive use exposes the land surface and water bodies to the herbicide, posing a risk to non-target organisms worldwide. GBH’s are broken down in the environment by the whole soil or water microbiome. There is incomplete understanding of different bacterial groups´ roles in this process Although not every single species can be isolated, its functional profile or metabolism counts. A species can be removed from the ensemble without a major negative impact on the overall process, as long as other microorganisms perform that same function. We currently have some insight into what single bacteria do when degrading glyphosate. In fact, the classic approach for bioremediation consists of isolating and studying the removal potential of single type of microorganism. Using this approach, investigators have identified the aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) and sarcosine pathway as a primary route of glyphosate breakdown. However, there remains a need for a glyphosate removal strategy that mimics natural microbiomes’ action to avoid glyphosate pseudo persistence by accumulation in the environment.
Palabras clave: PSEUDO-PERSISTENT , SYNTHETIC COMMUNITY , HORMESIS , MICROBIOME
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Tamaño: 17.11Mb
Formato: PDF
.
Solicitar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226531
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97000-0
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97000-0_5
URL: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-97000-0_5
Colecciones
Capítulos de libros(INIQUI)
Capítulos de libros de INST.DE INVEST.PARA LA INDUSTRIA QUIMICA (I)
Citación
Romano Armada, Neli; Rajal, Verónica Beatriz; Following the steps towards glyphosate bioremediation. How close are we to field success?; Springer Cham; 2022; 127-143
Compartir

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES