Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Semmartin, María Gisela  
dc.contributor.author
Cosentino, Diego  
dc.contributor.author
Poggio, Santiago Luis  
dc.contributor.author
Benedit, Beltrán  
dc.contributor.author
Biganzoli, Fernando  
dc.contributor.author
Peper, Alberto  
dc.date.available
2024-01-30T16:05:18Z  
dc.date.issued
2023-05  
dc.identifier.citation
Semmartin, María Gisela; Cosentino, Diego; Poggio, Santiago Luis; Benedit, Beltrán; Biganzoli, Fernando; et al.; Soil carbon accumulation in continuous cropping systems of the rolling Pampa (Argentina): The role of crop sequence, cover cropping and agronomic technology; Elsevier Science; Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment; 347; 108368; 5-2023; 1-9  
dc.identifier.issn
0167-8809  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/225291  
dc.description.abstract
The design of sustainable, high-yielding continuous cropping systems requires to maintain, or even restore, critical ecosystem properties, such as soil functioning. In the rolling Pampa (Argentina), total soil organic carbon decreased by 15–40% due to continuous agriculture. Therefore, soils are far from their potential carbon saturation. The most promising strategies to increase yield and restore carbon rely on the sustainable intensification of the current cropping systems based on no-tillage practices. Such strategies also involve increasing resource use through cover crops, increasing cropping intensity, and performing accurate and flexible fertilization and crop protection schemes. This study evaluated the effects of different cropping systems on soil organic carbon stocks in the uppermost 20 cm of the soil profile. We performed a 5-year experiment combining five cropping systems with different cash crop sequence (soybean mono-cropping and two different rotations) and agronomic technology (genotypes, fertilization, and crop protection), which in turn were evaluated under both fallow and cover cropping. Five years after the beginning of the experiment, all systems had a net positive balance of soil carbon accumulation, which averaged 2.25 t C.ha-1.yr-1. On average, 41% of plant carbon inputs remained within the first 20 cm of the soil profile. Cover crops increased plant carbon inputs, with larger effects as the cash crops occupied a shorter period in the field. Therefore, compared to fallow, cover crop doubled carbon input in soybean mono-cropping, had intermediate increments in the maize-soybean sequence, and had the lowest increments in the wheat/soybean-maize-soybean sequence. Under fallow, both rotations outperformed the plant carbon inputs of soybean mono-cropping. Management intensification, only evaluated for rotations, increased plant carbon inputs and soil carbon accumulation in a synergistic interaction with cover crop. Our results indicate that increasing carbon inputs through crop rotation, cover cropping and better agronomic technology is an opportunity to revert the long trend of soil carbon deficit of these agricultural lands.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
COVER CROPS  
dc.subject
CROP ROTATIONS  
dc.subject
PLANT INPUTS  
dc.subject
SOIL CARBON  
dc.subject
SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias del Suelo  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Soil carbon accumulation in continuous cropping systems of the rolling Pampa (Argentina): The role of crop sequence, cover cropping and agronomic technology  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2024-01-29T15:29:33Z  
dc.journal.volume
347  
dc.journal.number
108368  
dc.journal.pagination
1-9  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Semmartin, María Gisela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cosentino, Diego. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Recursos Naturales y Ambiente; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Poggio, Santiago Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Benedit, Beltrán. Bayer Crop Science; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Biganzoli, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Peper, Alberto. Bayer Crop Science; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167880923000270  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108368