Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Pomposiello, Maria Cristina  
dc.contributor.author
Booker, John  
dc.contributor.author
Favetto, Alicia Beatriz  
dc.date.available
2017-07-17T16:32:37Z  
dc.date.issued
2009-07  
dc.identifier.citation
Pomposiello, Maria Cristina; Booker, John; Favetto, Alicia Beatriz; A discussion of bias in magnetotelluric responses; Society of Exploration Geophysicists; Geophysics; 74; 4; 7-2009; 59-65  
dc.identifier.issn
0016-8033  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/20695  
dc.description.abstract
Magnetic-field noise biases magnitudes of magnetotelluric response functions such as resistivity, impedance, and the induction vector (tipper). This is particularly severe in the so-called dead band between about 1- and 10-s periods. The standard approach to remove these biases is to use a magnetic remote reference. In cases where this is unavailable or does not work because noise is correlated at the local and remote sites, it is possible to extract unbiased estimates using an inversion algorithm that predicts the magnitude from the phase. However, an important condition for this to be successful is that phase estimates are unbiased. Phase can be biased if parallel components of the electric and magnetic fields are correlated. This arises when the structure is 3D or when a 2D response is estimated in coordinates not parallel to strike. Improvements in electric field measurements make electric field references a viable option for estimating low-bias responses up to periods approaching 1000 s.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Society of Exploration Geophysicists  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Geophysics  
dc.subject
Magnetotelluric  
dc.subject
Bias  
dc.subject.classification
Geoquímica y Geofísica  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
A discussion of bias in magnetotelluric responses  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2017-07-13T18:31:08Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
1942-2156  
dc.journal.volume
74  
dc.journal.number
4  
dc.journal.pagination
59-65  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Tulsa  
dc.conicet.avisoEditorial
© 2009 Society of Exploration Geophysicists. All rights reserved.  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pomposiello, Maria Cristina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geocronología y Geología Isotopica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geocronología y Geología Isotópica; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Booker, John. University of Washington; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Favetto, Alicia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Geocronología y Geología Isotopica. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Geocronología y Geología Isotópica; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Geophysics  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.3147132  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://library.seg.org/doi/10.1190/1.3147132  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://geophysics.geoscienceworld.org/content/74/4/F59