Artículo
A discussion of bias in magnetotelluric responses
Fecha de publicación:
07/2009
Editorial:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Revista:
Geophysics
ISSN:
0016-8033
e-ISSN:
1942-2156
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
Magnetic-field noise biases magnitudes of magnetotelluric response functions such as resistivity, impedance, and the induction vector (tipper). This is particularly severe in the so-called dead band between about 1- and 10-s periods. The standard approach to remove these biases is to use a magnetic remote reference. In cases where this is unavailable or does not work because noise is correlated at the local and remote sites, it is possible to extract unbiased estimates using an inversion algorithm that predicts the magnitude from the phase. However, an important condition for this to be successful is that phase estimates are unbiased. Phase can be biased if parallel components of the electric and magnetic fields are correlated. This arises when the structure is 3D or when a 2D response is estimated in coordinates not parallel to strike. Improvements in electric field measurements make electric field references a viable option for estimating low-bias responses up to periods approaching 1000 s.
Palabras clave:
Geophysics
,
Magnetotelluric
,
Bias
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos(INGEIS)
Articulos de INST.DE GEOCRONOLOGIA Y GEOLOGIA ISOTOPICA (I)
Articulos de INST.DE GEOCRONOLOGIA Y GEOLOGIA ISOTOPICA (I)
Citación
Pomposiello, Maria Cristina; Booker, John; Favetto, Alicia Beatriz; A discussion of bias in magnetotelluric responses; Society of Exploration Geophysicists; Geophysics; 74; 4; 7-2009; 59-65
Compartir
Altmétricas