Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Haber, Alejandro  
dc.date.available
2023-04-20T11:07:19Z  
dc.date.issued
2012-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Haber, Alejandro; Un-Disciplining Archaeology; Springer; Archaeologies; 8; 1; 3-2012; 55-66  
dc.identifier.issn
1555-8622  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/194672  
dc.description.abstract
We can think of a kind of archaeological colonialism in terms of the exportation of metropolitan theories and/or methodologies to peripheral countries/regions, or in the way metropolitan academic institutions/archaeologists conduct archaeology in peripheral countries/regions. But even if we manage to stop those kinds of colonial bonds, archaeology would remain being an imperial weapon. And, moreover, it can be said that colonialism is not dependant on the overseas provenance of archaeologies and/or theories. Beyond theoretical and methodological variability, it is archaeology itself what happens to recapitulate colonialist relationships; and this seems to happen even when archaeology is openly and deliberately oriented towards indigenous peoples' empowerment, social justice, and peace. It seems that theoretical and methodological paradigms and political intentions operate at a surface level, while colonialism is equipped with stronger streams operating below the floor where archaeologists stand. What is there below our feet, making us move in one direction even when we walk in the other? Neither being the theories, neither the methods, nor the political intentions and nationality, what is that hidden force that govern the sense of archaeology in the contemporary post-colonial world? My argument is that the hidden force it is not hidden at all, but remains unseen because it is too obvious. The disciplinary framework of archaeology itself -that is, its basic subject matter and method-beyond the theoretical and methodological paradigms and the political orientation in which we aim to proceed, or our nationality or whatever, recapitulates coloniality. Without implying that theoretical and methodological debate within archaeological discipline is in vain, I dedicate this piece to write not within, but about the discipline. In short, this will include talking about disciplining, its recapitulation in post-disciplinary contexts, and the implied proposal of un-disciplining archaeology.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
DECOLONIAL  
dc.subject
DISCIPLINING  
dc.subject
EPISTEMOLOGY  
dc.subject
ONTOLOGY  
dc.subject
POST-COLONIALITY  
dc.subject.classification
Arqueología  
dc.subject.classification
Historia y Arqueología  
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES  
dc.title
Un-Disciplining Archaeology  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-04-19T15:08:22Z  
dc.journal.volume
8  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
55-66  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.ciudad
New York  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Haber, Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Escuela de Arqueología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Archaeologies  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11759-011-9178-4  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11759-011-9178-4