Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Rosler, Andres Bernardo  
dc.date.available
2023-04-03T14:29:32Z  
dc.date.issued
2011-06  
dc.identifier.citation
Rosler, Andres Bernardo; Odi et Amo? Hobbes on the state of nature; Brill Academic Publishers; Hobbes Studies; 24; 1; 6-2011; 91-111  
dc.identifier.issn
0921-5891  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192456  
dc.description.abstract
Very few-if any-will doubt Hobbes's aversion to the state of nature and sympathy for civil society. On the other hand, it is not quite news that it would be inaccurate to claim that Hobbes rejected the state of nature entirely. Indeed, he embraced or at the very least tolerated the state of nature at the international level in order to escape from the individual state of nature. Hobbes's recommended exchange of an individual state of nature for an international one does seem to have a smack of contradiction, arguably first noted by Rousseau. There is yet another charge of contradiction lurking around Hobbes's account of the state of nature. Hobbes's political thought would still reflect an ambivalent attitude towards a third instantiation of the state of nature, i.e. civil war. This is one of the main reasons why the political allegiance of Thomas Hobbes has been an issue ever since the publication of De Cive at the very least. This paper deals with Hobbes's differential treatment of the original and the international states of nature and discusses the source of Hobbes's somewhat ambivalent attitude towards civil war. It is here argued that Hobbes can fairly hold his ground vis-à-vis Rousseau's criticism, in spite of the normative resemblance between the international state of nature and the initial state of nature, and that Hobbes ambivalent attitude of attraction and repulsion towards civil war is actually due not so much to opportunism on his part as to the normative autonomy he has granted to the state of nature.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Brill Academic Publishers  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CIVIL WAR  
dc.subject
NEGATIVE ASSOCIATION  
dc.subject
STATE OF NATURE  
dc.subject
WAR  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Filosofía, Étnica y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión  
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES  
dc.title
Odi et Amo? Hobbes on the state of nature  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2023-04-03T12:08:12Z  
dc.identifier.eissn
1875-0257  
dc.journal.volume
24  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
91-111  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Leiden  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rosler, Andres Bernardo. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Departamento de Filosofía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Hobbes Studies  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/view/journals/hobs/24/1/article-p91_8.xml  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187502511X563826