Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel
dc.contributor.author
Otegui, Luis Jose
dc.contributor.author
Buisel, Luis María
dc.date.available
2022-10-27T15:50:32Z
dc.date.issued
2019-12
dc.identifier.citation
Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel; Otegui, Luis Jose; Buisel, Luis María; Explosion in gas pipeline: Witnesses' perceptions and expert analyses' results; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Engineering Failure Analysis; 106; 12-2019; 1-12
dc.identifier.issn
1350-6307
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/175212
dc.description.abstract
The failure of a 24“natural gas pipeline buried in the 1960s led to a blowout followed by fire. The damage caused the breakage and expulsion of 20 meters of tube; flames reached 30 meters high. The break occurred at the edge of a high transit route, in the opposite site of a thermoelectric plant, and under its high-voltage lines. The break was a consequence of a fracture propagated from a pre-existing defect in the reinforcement weld toe of a 3” connection to a nearby village, made 20 years before. The preexisting defect propagated from small weld anomalies, due to external loads related to soil instabilities: removal of top soil for pipe recoating and flooding due to extraordinary rains paired with the recent construction of a highway that distorted normal water flows. Lessons were also learned in terms of the role of witness recounts. Even after root causes were technically established, responsibility was erroneously attributed to high voltage cables (in the ignition of the gas cloud) and dynamic loads from traffic (as cause for leak), due in large part to the credibility given to initial descriptions. Witnesses identified three events: (1) a noise associated with the blow-out, (2) noise and flashes associated with electrical arcing and (3) the final explosion of the gas cloud, although they did not agree on the sequence of the first two events. The immediacy of the three events and the witnesses´ different places and distances from the blowout site justify the differences of time between their perceptions of light and sound.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
BLOW OUT
dc.subject
FAILURE ANALYSIS
dc.subject
GAS PIPELINE
dc.subject
WELD DEFECTS
dc.subject
WITNESS BIAS
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ingeniería de los Materiales
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería de los Materiales
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS
dc.title
Explosion in gas pipeline: Witnesses' perceptions and expert analyses' results
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2022-10-27T10:26:04Z
dc.journal.volume
106
dc.journal.pagination
1-12
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel. YPF - Tecnología; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Otegui, Luis Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. YPF - Tecnología; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Buisel, Luis María. No especifíca;
dc.journal.title
Engineering Failure Analysis
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1350630718309853
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.08.008
Archivos asociados