Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel  
dc.contributor.author
Otegui, Luis Jose  
dc.contributor.author
Buisel, Luis María  
dc.date.available
2022-10-27T15:50:32Z  
dc.date.issued
2019-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel; Otegui, Luis Jose; Buisel, Luis María; Explosion in gas pipeline: Witnesses' perceptions and expert analyses' results; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Engineering Failure Analysis; 106; 12-2019; 1-12  
dc.identifier.issn
1350-6307  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/175212  
dc.description.abstract
The failure of a 24“natural gas pipeline buried in the 1960s led to a blowout followed by fire. The damage caused the breakage and expulsion of 20 meters of tube; flames reached 30 meters high. The break occurred at the edge of a high transit route, in the opposite site of a thermoelectric plant, and under its high-voltage lines. The break was a consequence of a fracture propagated from a pre-existing defect in the reinforcement weld toe of a 3” connection to a nearby village, made 20 years before. The preexisting defect propagated from small weld anomalies, due to external loads related to soil instabilities: removal of top soil for pipe recoating and flooding due to extraordinary rains paired with the recent construction of a highway that distorted normal water flows. Lessons were also learned in terms of the role of witness recounts. Even after root causes were technically established, responsibility was erroneously attributed to high voltage cables (in the ignition of the gas cloud) and dynamic loads from traffic (as cause for leak), due in large part to the credibility given to initial descriptions. Witnesses identified three events: (1) a noise associated with the blow-out, (2) noise and flashes associated with electrical arcing and (3) the final explosion of the gas cloud, although they did not agree on the sequence of the first two events. The immediacy of the three events and the witnesses´ different places and distances from the blowout site justify the differences of time between their perceptions of light and sound.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BLOW OUT  
dc.subject
FAILURE ANALYSIS  
dc.subject
GAS PIPELINE  
dc.subject
WELD DEFECTS  
dc.subject
WITNESS BIAS  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ingeniería de los Materiales  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería de los Materiales  
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS  
dc.title
Explosion in gas pipeline: Witnesses' perceptions and expert analyses' results  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2022-10-27T10:26:04Z  
dc.journal.volume
106  
dc.journal.pagination
1-12  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel. YPF - Tecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Otegui, Luis Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. YPF - Tecnología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Buisel, Luis María. No especifíca;  
dc.journal.title
Engineering Failure Analysis  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1350630718309853  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.08.008