Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

Explosion in gas pipeline: Witnesses' perceptions and expert analyses' results

Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel; Otegui, Luis JoseIcon ; Buisel, Luis María
Fecha de publicación: 12/2019
Editorial: Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
Revista: Engineering Failure Analysis
ISSN: 1350-6307
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Otras Ingeniería de los Materiales

Resumen

The failure of a 24“natural gas pipeline buried in the 1960s led to a blowout followed by fire. The damage caused the breakage and expulsion of 20 meters of tube; flames reached 30 meters high. The break occurred at the edge of a high transit route, in the opposite site of a thermoelectric plant, and under its high-voltage lines. The break was a consequence of a fracture propagated from a pre-existing defect in the reinforcement weld toe of a 3” connection to a nearby village, made 20 years before. The preexisting defect propagated from small weld anomalies, due to external loads related to soil instabilities: removal of top soil for pipe recoating and flooding due to extraordinary rains paired with the recent construction of a highway that distorted normal water flows. Lessons were also learned in terms of the role of witness recounts. Even after root causes were technically established, responsibility was erroneously attributed to high voltage cables (in the ignition of the gas cloud) and dynamic loads from traffic (as cause for leak), due in large part to the credibility given to initial descriptions. Witnesses identified three events: (1) a noise associated with the blow-out, (2) noise and flashes associated with electrical arcing and (3) the final explosion of the gas cloud, although they did not agree on the sequence of the first two events. The immediacy of the three events and the witnesses´ different places and distances from the blowout site justify the differences of time between their perceptions of light and sound.
Palabras clave: BLOW OUT , FAILURE ANALYSIS , GAS PIPELINE , WELD DEFECTS , WITNESS BIAS
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Tamaño: 5.179Mb
Formato: PDF
.
Solicitar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/175212
URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1350630718309853
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.08.008
Colecciones
Articulos(CCT - LA PLATA)
Articulos de CTRO.CIENTIFICO TECNOL.CONICET - LA PLATA
Citación
Cirimello, Pablo Gabriel; Otegui, Luis Jose; Buisel, Luis María; Explosion in gas pipeline: Witnesses' perceptions and expert analyses' results; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Engineering Failure Analysis; 106; 12-2019; 1-12
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES