Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

Comparison of six commercial systems for the detection of non-O157 STEC in meat and vegetables

Costa, MagdalenaIcon ; Sucari, Adriana; Epszteyn, Sergio; Oteiza, Juan MartínIcon ; Gentiluomo, Jimena; Melamed, Celia; Figueroa, Yamila; Mingorance, Santiago; Grisaro, Agustina; Spioussas, Silvia; Buffoni Almeida, Mariana; Caruso, Mailen; Pontoni, Andrés; Signorini, Marcelo; Leotta, Gerardo AnibalIcon
Fecha de publicación: 12/2019
Editorial: Academic Press Ltd - Elsevier Science Ltd
Revista: Food Microbiology
ISSN: 0740-0020
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias

Resumen

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are important pathogens transmitted by food that may cause severe illness in human beings. Thus, systems for STEC detection in food should have increasingly higher sensitivity and specificity. Here we compared six commercial systems for non-O157 STEC detection in meat and vegetables and determined their sensitivity, specificity and repeatability. A total of 46 samples (meat n=23; chard n=23) were experimentally contaminated with strains O26:H11, O45:H-, O103:H2, O111:NM, O121:H19 and O145:NM isolated in Argentina. Strain detection was confirmed by isolation according to ISO 13136:2012. Detection of the stx and eae genes in meat samples was highly satisfactory with all commercial kits, but only five had 100% sensitivity and specificity in chard. Of four kits evaluated for serogroup detection, three had 100% sensitivity and specificity, and one had 93.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All kits were adequate to analyze meat but not vegetable samples, and were not therefore validated for the latter matrix. The challenge for microbiology laboratories is to identify the advantages and disadvantages of the available kits for STEC detection in food based on a clear knowledge of the particular needs of each laboratory.
Palabras clave: STEC , SCREENING , COMPARISON , MEAT
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Tamaño: 243.4Kb
Formato: PDF
.
Solicitar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/119111
URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0740002019304332
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103273
Colecciones
Articulos(IGEVET)
Articulos de INST.DE GENETICA VET ING FERNANDO NOEL DULOUT
Citación
Costa, Magdalena; Sucari, Adriana; Epszteyn, Sergio; Oteiza, Juan Martín; Gentiluomo, Jimena; et al.; Comparison of six commercial systems for the detection of non-O157 STEC in meat and vegetables; Academic Press Ltd - Elsevier Science Ltd; Food Microbiology; 84; 12-2019
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES