Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Kopecký, Petr  
dc.contributor.author
Meyer Sahling, Jan Hinrik  
dc.contributor.author
Panizza, Francisco  
dc.contributor.author
Scherlis Perel, Gerardo Ezequiel  
dc.contributor.author
Schuster, Christian  
dc.contributor.author
Spirova, MarÍa  
dc.date.available
2020-03-06T20:17:17Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-05  
dc.identifier.citation
Kopecký, Petr; Meyer Sahling, Jan Hinrik; Panizza, Francisco; Scherlis Perel, Gerardo Ezequiel; Schuster, Christian; et al.; Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions; Blackwell Publishing Ltd; European Journal of Political Research; 55; 2; 5-2016; 416-431  
dc.identifier.issn
1475-6765  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/98984  
dc.description.abstract
This Research Note presents a new dataset of party patronage in 22 countries from five regions. The data was collected using the same methodology to compare patterns of patronage within countries, across countries and across world regions that are usually studied separately. The Note addresses three research questions that are at the centre of debates on party patronage, which is understood as the power of political parties to make appointments to the public and semi-public sector: the scope of patronage, the underlying motivations and the criteria on the basis of which appointees are selected. The exploration of the dataset shows that party patronage is, to a different degree, widespread across all regions. The data further shows differences between policy areas, types of institutions such as government ministries, agencies and state-owned enterprises, and higher, middle and lower ranks of the bureaucracy. It is demonstrated that the political control of policy making and implementation is the most common motivation for making political appointments. However, in countries with a large scope of patronage, appointments serve the purpose of both political control and rewarding supporters in exchange for votes and services. Finally, the data shows that parties prefer to select appointees who are characterised by political and personal loyalty as well as professional competence.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CLIENTELISM  
dc.subject
PATRONAGE  
dc.subject
POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS  
dc.subject
POLITICAL PARTIES  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencia Política  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencia Política  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Party patronage in contemporary democracies: Results from an expert survey in 22 countries from five regions  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2020-03-05T13:38:01Z  
dc.journal.volume
55  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
416-431  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kopecký, Petr. Leiden University; Países Bajos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Meyer Sahling, Jan Hinrik. University of Nottingham; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Panizza, Francisco. The London School of Economics and Political Sc.; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Scherlis Perel, Gerardo Ezequiel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Schuster, Christian. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Spirova, MarÍa. Leiden University; Países Bajos  
dc.journal.title
European Journal of Political Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1475-6765.12135  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12135