Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier  
dc.contributor.author
Kiørboe, Thomas  
dc.date.available
2020-03-05T17:41:48Z  
dc.date.issued
2015-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier; Kiørboe, Thomas; Perceiving the algae: How feeding-current feeding copepods detect their nonmotile prey; American Society of Limnology and Oceanography; Limnology and Oceanography; 60; 4; 3-2015; 1286-1297  
dc.identifier.issn
1939-5590  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/98844  
dc.description.abstract
Feeding-current feeding copepods detect and capture prey individually, but the mechanism by which nonmotile prey is detected has been unclear. Early reports that copepods detect phytoplankton prey at distances of one body length or more led to the hypothesis that solutes leaking from the prey would be carried to the copepod by the sheared feeding current and arrive prior to the prey, thus allowing the copepod to adjust the feeding current to bring the prey within reach of the feeding appendages. Many subsequent studies have been interpreted assuming this mechanism, which appears currently to be the main accepted view. Here, we review the observations available in the literature and add our own data to show that in most cases the prey, whether phytoplankton cells or inert particles, has to be within a few prey radii from the setae of the feeding appendages to elicit a capture response. We further demonstrate that (1) long-range chemical detection is incompatible with known algal leakage rates and reasonable assumptions of sensitivity, (2) that near-field chemical detection is constrained by diffusion across the boundary layer of the sensor and takes longer than observed near-contact times, and (3) that most reported detection distances are well predicted by models of fluid mechanical signal generation and detection. We conclude that near-field mechanoreception is the common prey detection mode in pelagic copepods. Prey detection distances are thus governed mainly by the reach of the feeding appendages, in contrast to the strong prey size-dependency implied by remote chemical prey detection.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
American Society of Limnology and Oceanography  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ZOOPLANKTON  
dc.subject
PREY CAPTURE  
dc.subject
FEEDING  
dc.subject
PREY DETECTION  
dc.subject.classification
Biología Marina, Limnología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Perceiving the algae: How feeding-current feeding copepods detect their nonmotile prey  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2020-03-03T15:08:42Z  
dc.journal.volume
60  
dc.journal.number
4  
dc.journal.pagination
1286-1297  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gonçalves, Rodrigo Javier. Technical University Of Denmark. National Institute For Aquatic Resources. Section Of Ocean Ecology And Climate; Dinamarca. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Playa Unión. Estación de Fotobiología Playa Unión; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kiørboe, Thomas. Technical University Of Denmark. National Institute For Aquatic Resources. Section Of Ocean Ecology And Climate; Dinamarca  
dc.journal.title
Limnology and Oceanography  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lno.10102/abstract  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lno.10102