Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Taylor, Thomas N.  
dc.contributor.author
Taylor, Edith L.  
dc.contributor.author
Decombeix, Anne Laure  
dc.contributor.author
Schwendemann, Andrew  
dc.contributor.author
Serbet, Rudolph  
dc.contributor.author
Escapa, Ignacio Hernán  
dc.contributor.author
Krings, Michael  
dc.date.available
2020-02-18T19:49:51Z  
dc.date.issued
2010-07  
dc.identifier.citation
Taylor, Thomas N.; Taylor, Edith L.; Decombeix, Anne Laure; Schwendemann, Andrew; Serbet, Rudolph; et al.; The Enigmatic devonian fossil prototaxites is not a rolled-up liverwort mat: Comment on the paper by Graham et al. (AJB 97: 268 - 275); Botanical Society of America; American Journal of Botany; 97; 7; 7-2010; 1074-1078  
dc.identifier.issn
0002-9122  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97957  
dc.description.abstract
It should not be surprising that there are numerous examples of fossil organisms for which there are no known direct modern analogues. The seed ferns of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, arborescent sphenophytes, and a number of Silurian and Devonian organisms sometimes placed in the artificial group Nematophytales (19 or Nematophyta (27 represent examples of such organisms. These organisms either combine morphological and anatomical features not found in the modern biota or are constructed differently from any other living or fossil life form (10. The nematophytes are undoubtedly among the latter, and the biology and systematic affinities of these organisms have remained controversial since their first discovery more than 150 years ago (16; 20. In nematophytes that are structurally preserved, it can be seen that they are composed entirely of tubes of various size, shape, and orientation (29; some of the tubes are characterized by relatively complex cross walls with a roofed central pore resembling a dolipore or parenthesome (22; 16; 28, fig. 6.9). One of the most unusual of these organisms is Prototaxites, a fossil that was initially described as partially degraded gymnosperm wood based on silicified specimens from the Gaspé of Canada (8, 9; 5. Fossils interpreted as Prototaxites have been reported as compressed, coalified remains (4, but the most interesting are silicified specimens that occur as “logs,” which may be more than 1 m in diameter and 8 m long (16. Hypotheses as to the affinities of these fossils have included seed plants (9, several algal types (e.g., 17; 24; 21, an early, terrestrial evolutionary dead end (19; 1, a lichen‐like association of a fungus and an autotrophic carbon source (25, and some type of terrestrial saprotrophic organism, i.e., a fungus, with affinities perhaps closest to the Basidiomycota (7; 15; 16. Likewise, biomarkers and carbon‐isotope signatures, while not identifying the organism, do suggest some type of heterotrophic nutritional mode (4. The most recent suggestion is that Prototaxites represents extensive mats of a liverwort similar to modern Marchantia that were rolled up by wind, gravity, or water to form the so‐called logs that are found silicified in Silurian–Devonian rocks (13. Based on a number of factors, including the anatomy of Prototaxites trunks, their mode of preservation as fossils, and the environment in which they lived, we take exception with the opinion of 13 and with some of the methodology used to develop their interpretations as to the affinities of Prototaxites.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Botanical Society of America  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Prototaxites  
dc.subject
Devonian fossil  
dc.subject.classification
Paleontología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
The Enigmatic devonian fossil prototaxites is not a rolled-up liverwort mat: Comment on the paper by Graham et al. (AJB 97: 268 - 275)  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-11-25T18:06:21Z  
dc.journal.volume
97  
dc.journal.number
7  
dc.journal.pagination
1074-1078  
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.ciudad
St. Louis  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Taylor, Thomas N.. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Taylor, Edith L.. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Decombeix, Anne Laure. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Schwendemann, Andrew. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Serbet, Rudolph. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Escapa, Ignacio Hernán. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Krings, Michael. Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie; Alemania. University of Kansas; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
American Journal of Botany  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000047  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.3732/ajb.1000047