Artículo

LFIs and methods of classical recapture

Tajer, DiegoIcon
Fecha de publicación: 11/2018
Editorial: Oxford University Press
Revista: Logic Journal of the IGPL (print)
ISSN: 1367-0751
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:

Resumen

In this paper, I will argue that Logics of Formal Inconsistency (LFIs) can be used as very sophisticated and powerful methods of classical recapture. I will compare LFIs with the well-known non-monotonic logics by Batens (2001, Log. Anal., 45–68) and Priest (2006, In Contradiction, Oxford University) and the ‘shrieking’ rules of Beall (2013, Rev. Symb. Log., 6, 755–764). I will show that these proposals can be represented in LFIs and that LFIs give room to more complex and varied recapturing strategies
Palabras clave: Logics of Formal Inconsistency , Classical recapture , Paraconsistent Logic , Non-monotonic logic
 
Archivos asociados
Thumbnail
 
Tamaño: 282.5Kb
Formato: PDF
.
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97464
URL: https://academic.oup.com/jigpal/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jigpal/jzy060/520827
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzy060
Colecciones
Articulos(IIF)
Articulos de INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES FILOSOFICAS
Citación
Tajer, Diego; LFIs and methods of classical recapture; Oxford University Press; Logic Journal of the IGPL (print); 11-2018; 1-10
Compartir
Altmétricas