Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Vignaduzzo, Silvana Edit  
dc.contributor.author
Vera Candioti, Luciana  
dc.contributor.author
Castellano, Patricia Margarita  
dc.contributor.author
Goicoechea, Hector Casimiro  
dc.contributor.author
Kaufman, Teodoro Saul  
dc.date.available
2020-02-02T21:22:56Z  
dc.date.issued
2011-10  
dc.identifier.citation
Vignaduzzo, Silvana Edit; Vera Candioti, Luciana; Castellano, Patricia Margarita; Goicoechea, Hector Casimiro; Kaufman, Teodoro Saul; Multivariate optimization and validation of a CZE method for the analysis of pridinol mesylate and meloxicam in tablets; Vieweg; Chromatographia; 74; 10-2011; 609-617  
dc.identifier.issn
0009-5893  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/96499  
dc.description.abstract
A capillary zone electrophoresis method for the simultaneous determination of pridinol mesylate (PRI) and meloxicam (MEL) employing epinastine hydrochloride and piroxicam as internal standards, was developed and optimized employing experimental design and response surface methodologies. The separation was optimally achieved in less than 2 min at 30 kV in an uncoated fused-silica capillary (41.4 cm × 75 μm I.D.), employing an 18 mmol L-1 sodium phosphate buffer solution (pH 5.90) at 25 °C. Samples were injected in hydrodynamic mode (50 mbar, 5 s) and the analytes were spectrophotometrically detected at 200 nm. Method robustness was demonstrated by ANOVA of determinations performed under conditions slightly different from the optimum. The method was validated regarding separation selectivity (peak purity factors > 0.99), linearity and range (PRI = 17.6-31.4 mg L-1; MEL = 66.5-122.5 mg L-1), accuracy (PRI = 100.2-101.9%; MEL = 98.9-100.7%) and precision. The RSD values obtained were ≥1.3% for injection repeatability and ≥1.9% for intra-day precision. The limits of detection (1.0 and 0.9 mg L-1) and quantification (3.3 and 16.5 mg L-1) of PRI and MEL, respectively, were also determined. The method was successfully applied to the determination of both drugs in three brands of tablet formulations. No statistically significant differences were observed when these results were compared with those of a RP-HPLC method.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Vieweg  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CAPILLARY ZONE ELECTROPHORESIS  
dc.subject
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS  
dc.subject
MELOXICAM  
dc.subject
PRIDINOL  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Multivariate optimization and validation of a CZE method for the analysis of pridinol mesylate and meloxicam in tablets  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2020-01-29T19:21:13Z  
dc.journal.volume
74  
dc.journal.pagination
609-617  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Heidelberg  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vignaduzzo, Silvana Edit. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vera Candioti, Luciana. National University Of The Litoral; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Castellano, Patricia Margarita. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Goicoechea, Hector Casimiro. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kaufman, Teodoro Saul. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Chromatographia  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.springer.com  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-011-2108-1