Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Drosina, Marina del Valle  
dc.contributor.author
Barredo, Silvia  
dc.contributor.author
Stinco, Luis  
dc.contributor.author
Giambiagi, Laura Beatriz  
dc.contributor.author
Migliavacca, Osvaldo  
dc.date.available
2019-12-27T18:07:17Z  
dc.date.issued
2017-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Drosina, Marina del Valle; Barredo, Silvia; Stinco, Luis; Giambiagi, Laura Beatriz; Migliavacca, Osvaldo; Petrofísica básica de los depósitos del ciclo Precuyano, Sierra de Cara Cura, Mendoza; Asociación Argentina de Sedimentología; Latin America Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis; 24; 2; 12-2017; 75-91  
dc.identifier.issn
1851-4979  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/93120  
dc.description.abstract
En este trabajo se analiza la sucesión aflorante en el sector norte de la Sierra de la Cara Cura conformada por rocas volcaniclásticas pertenecientes al Ciclo Precuyano. Estos depósitos se caracterizan por la presencia de niveles de brechas masivas monomícticas de hasta 15 m de espesor que intercalan niveles de rocas volcánicas de entre 5 y 8 m de espesor. El análisis integral de las muestras recolectadas, permitió obtener los valores de porosidad y permeabilidad de depósitos de bloques y cenizas y flujos lávicos de composición andesítica para determinar su potencial como roca reservorio de yacimientos convencionales. La porosidad total observada al microscopio es pobre, menor al 5% para las rocas ígneas y de un 7 % para las rocas volcaniclásticas. De los estudios de laboratorio se pudieron obtener valores de porosidad efectiva y permeabilidad al gas, comprendidos entre 9,7 y 21,46% y 0,288 y 1,339 mD en los depósitos volcaniclásticos y de entre 8,6 y 19,5% y 0,009 y 0,014 mD en los flujos lávicos. En función de estos resultados se pudo caracterizar la porosidad, analizar su origen e interpretar los factores que la pudieron modificar. Se comprobó que el espacio poral para muestras de afloramiento de los niveles ígneos resulta fundamentalmente de los procesos que afectaron a estas rocas durante su emplazamiento y posterior diagénesis (primeramente fracturación y alteración de minerales). Se estimó que un 70% del volumen total de porosidad en la roca ígnea corresponde a poros secundarios, mientras que el 30% restante son primarios. La porosidad secundaria está dada por la presencia de fracturas, tanto de origen tectónico como hidrotermal, y a procesos de disolución, mientras que la porosidad primaria se debe a la presencia de disyunciones columnares, vesículas en las coladas lávicas y alteración mineral. Las rocas volcaniclásticas presentan un 80% de porosidad secundaria asociada a fracturas de origen tectónico y a procesos de disolución mientras que el 20 % restante corresponde a porosidad primaria asociada a vesículas y a una incipiente disyunción columnar. Este estudio se enfocó en definir los procesos que posibilitaron a rocas ígneas y volcaniclásticas poseer características de reservorios, como posible herramienta para definir zonas favorables dentro de los cuerpos rocosos para el almacenamiento y vías de migración de los hidrocarburos. Se concluye que las facies piroclásticas asociadas a los flujos de bloques y cenizas presentan las mejores propiedades de reservorio en esta localidad, a la vez que la porosidad que predomina es del tipo secundaria, generada por microfracturación y por la disolución de componentes. En este trabajo se propone la existencia de dos tipos de reservorios en los depósitos estudiados del Precuyano, el primero, constituido por los depósitos de bloques y cenizas,donde este sistema poroso-permeable podría ser comparable a aquellos de origen carbonáticos fracturados, mientras que el segundo está representado por las coladas andesíticas que se comportan como un reservorio fisurado.  
dc.description.abstract
In the ninetieth, the discovery of hydrocarbons in volcanic or volcaniclastic rocks was not considered economically viable in the petroleum exploration because of the lack of reservoir quality. However, during last decades many examples from our country proved to be real targets like, Campo Océano, Octógono, Cupén Mahuida (Sruoga et al., 2004; Sruoga and Rubinstein, 2007; Schiuma et al., 2011; Velo et al., 2014). These latter and the need to increase gas/oil production challenged industry to deepen into the knowledge of the pore structure of their deposits. Volcanic and volcaniclastics deposits can develop porosity in different ways. The more elemental process that lead to the possible formation of porosity takes place once fragments have been ejected from the volcano edifice. As they are deposited mechanically by gravity or fluid transport, porosity results from the degree of sorting of fragments and their type of packaging. After deposition pore space will be modified by diagenetic processes being the more important burial and compactation and cement/clay formation similar to clastics deposits. But unlike typical sedimentary rocks, the nature and style of the eruption and subsequent cooling of these rocks add significant controlling factors over the evolution of the porosity. Some of the most relevant are the alteration of chemically unstable minerals during volcanic processes, the welding of hot material after deposition and fracturing due to cooling. Primary porosity comprises gas voids, vesicles, intergranular pores and some cooling joints; secondary porosity includes intracrystalline dissolution, matrix dissolution pores, fractures, fissures, weathering cracks and interstices. The secondary porosity is frequently the only kind present and may be the result of hydrothermal alteration, fracturing and late-stage diagenetic mineral alteration. The main purpose of this contribution is to characterize a volcaniclastic and volcanic sequence of the Precuyano Cycle in the north flank of Sierra de la Cara Cura, Neuquén Basin (Fig. 1). The region holds block and ash flows and lava facies detailed previously by Drosina et al. (2017) (Fig. 2, 3). Results of core observation, thin section analysis and scanning electronic microscope (SEM) indicate that the quality of volcanic rock reservoirs is controlled not only by their lithofacies but also by the diagenetic and tectonic processes affecting them. Detailed petrophysical laboratory studies permitted us to additionally arrive to numerical values of the porosity and permeability of the most representative levels of volcaniclastics and volcanic deposits of the Precuyano Cycle. The volcaniclastics levels are composed of block and ash deposits (Figs 2 and 3). There are poorly sorted, massive mixtures of decimeter- to meter-sized blocks set within a fine lapilli to medium ash-grade matrix; thickness range from 12.50 to 0.95 meters in the SE-NW direction. Primary porosity is controlled by vesiculation in the andesitic pyroclasts and some and scarce columnar jointing. Secondary porosity is represented by micro structures in the andesitic blocks frequently filled-in with iron oxides. Mesofractures are prevalent and cut through multiple lava flows and block and ash deposits. Another secondary porosity corresponds to crystalloclast dissolution with the consequent intracrystalline and vuggy types porosities (0.004 – 0.62 mm, micropores) (Fig. 4). The effective porosity and permeability to gas, for the sequence varies between 9.7 to 21.46% and 0.288 to 1.339 mD respectively (Table 1 and Fig. 8). The volcanic levels are composed of abundant tabular andesitic flows facies that are laterally continuous along several kilometers (Figs. 2 and 3). Their thicknesses range from 5.2 to 8.4 meters. Individual lava flows can be divided into base, core and top facies, with lava piles comprising repeated cycles of these distinct facies. The best reservoir quality concerning primary porosity occurs in andesitic flow tops where vesicular interconnected porosity dominates but significantly decreases to the core of due to compactation and mineral alteration. Secondary porosity results mainly from jointing and fracturing from both tectonic and long-lasting cooling. They cut throughout multiple flows to connect the flow tops (the favorable reservoir) horizons and even with the flow core. Syn- and post-depositional hydrothermal alteration induces a hydraulic local fracture network. Weathering alteration products also fill-in open spaces like dissolution cavities, vesicles, fractures and form mineral aggregates as part of phenocrystal replacement (Figs. 4 and 5). The effective porosity and permeability to gas, for the sequence varies between 8.6 and 19.5%, 0.014 and 0.009 mD with anomalous values of up to 32.182 mD (Table 1 and Fig. 6). The results obtained herein permit to propose the existence two types of reservoirs in the Precuyano Cycle of the Cara Cura depocenter. One observed in the volcaniclastics deposits that proved to be complex enough to be compare with that observed in fractured carbonate reservoirs and the other is associated with the volcanic deposits. Significant pore reduction was observed in numerous levels results from compactation, tuff welding and mineral alteration, commonly of sericite type, induced by the volcanic process itself and by diagenesis. These latter point to a grade of “uncertainty” when exploring and producing these oil fields due to the resulting lateral and vertical heterogeneities in the texture and structure of the rock bodies that greatly condition the drilling and seismic operations and lately, the production programs.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
spa  
dc.publisher
Asociación Argentina de Sedimentología  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Rocas Volcaniclásticas  
dc.subject
Porosidad  
dc.subject
Permeabilidad  
dc.subject
Ciclo Precuyano  
dc.subject.classification
Meteorología y Ciencias Atmosféricas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Petrofísica básica de los depósitos del ciclo Precuyano, Sierra de Cara Cura, Mendoza  
dc.title
Basic petrophysics of the Precuyano Cycle, Cara Cura hills, Mendoza  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-05-23T18:48:20Z  
dc.journal.volume
24  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
75-91  
dc.journal.pais
Argentina  
dc.journal.ciudad
Buenos Aires  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Drosina, Marina. Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Barredo, Silvia. Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Stinco, Luis. Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Giambiagi, Laura Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Migliavacca, Osvaldo. Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Latin America Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=381757292004  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://ppct.caicyt.gov.ar/index.php/lajsba/article/view/12493