Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Santachiara, Gabriel  
dc.contributor.author
Salvagiotti, Fernando  
dc.contributor.author
Gerde, Jose Arnaldo  
dc.contributor.author
Rotundo, José Luis  
dc.date.available
2019-11-25T21:35:28Z  
dc.date.issued
2018-06  
dc.identifier.citation
Santachiara, Gabriel; Salvagiotti, Fernando; Gerde, Jose Arnaldo; Rotundo, José Luis; Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 223; 6-2018; 171-178  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-4290  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90378  
dc.description.abstract
Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] represents, on average, 60% of total nitrogen (N) uptake. Nitrogen dilution curves link aboveground crop N concentration (%N) to biomass accumulation (W). It has been reported that BNF is an energy-intensive process that might reduce biomass production per unit of captured N (physiological N use efficiency or NUE). This increased energy cost could lead to a more attenuated N (i.e. less efficient) dilution curve. However, there are no reports comparing N dilution curves for soybean crops differing in N source. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the impact of BNF on soybean N dilution curves and how it influences NUE, and (ii) establish independent N dilution curves for soil and atmospheric N. Our working hypothesis is that relying on BNF attenuates the N dilution curve and reduces NUE. The experiment consisted of a control and a fertilized treatment, 0 and 600 kg N ha−1 respectively, applied to four soybean genotypes in order to establish two differential BNF situations. While the control and fertilized treatments had differential N accumulation from BNF, ∼70% and ∼16%, respectively, there were no differences observed in seed yield (∼5000 kg ha−1), NUE (∼36 kg kg−1) and only slight differences in total N uptake (∼365 kg N ha−1 in fertilized treatment compared to ∼389 kg h−1 in the control treatment). Results suggest that reliance on BNF for N does not influence substantially the attenuation of the N dilution curve and has no impact on NUE. The N dilution parameter (“b”) ranged from −0.128 to −0.218 among cultivars and fertilization treatments. The less negative values (more attenuated curve) corresponded to the fertilized plots likely associated with luxury N consumption. Interestingly, dilution curves from soil mineral N showed the typical dilution pattern, while N derived from the atmosphere followed a concentration pattern as the crop developed. This most likely reflects the continuous N flux from BNF to the plant as opposed to the decreasing soil mineral N supply. Recognizing these concentration/dilution curves for atmospheric and soil N has three immediate implications. First, the atmospheric N concentration curve might indicate an upper benchmark for evaluating symbiosis performance during crop development. Second, the concentration pattern observed for BNF could potentially help to reverse the observed decline in seed protein concentration in modern soybean cultivars. Third, the N concentration/dilution curves for the individual N sources could be incorporated into crop models for estimating BNF at different crop biomass levels during soybean development.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
ATMOSPHERIC NITROGEN  
dc.subject
FERTILIZATION  
dc.subject
MINERAL SOIL ABSORPTION  
dc.subject
NUTRITION  
dc.subject
RHIZOBIUM  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Does biological nitrogen fixation modify soybean nitrogen dilution curves?  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-10-23T20:51:16Z  
dc.journal.volume
223  
dc.journal.pagination
171-178  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Santachiara, Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gerde, Jose Arnaldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rotundo, José Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Field Crops Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429017316143  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.001