Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Diaz, Silvina Laura
dc.date.available
2019-11-05T19:44:23Z
dc.date.issued
2018-07
dc.identifier.citation
Diaz, Silvina Laura; Conducting and reporting animal experimentation: Quo vadis?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; European Journal Of Neuroscience; 7-2018; 1-6
dc.identifier.issn
0953-816X
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/88084
dc.description.abstract
Most scientific journals ask authors to include a statement in their articles that animal studies have been carried out in agreement with international regulations on the use and care of laboratory animals. This statement implies that all the experiments conducted on animals have been evaluated and accepted by an Ethical Committee and, that animal welfare has been put as a priority throughout the experimental protocol. Nevertheless, discrepancies are commonly found between the described procedures and the guidelines that are claimed to have been followed; this reveals a double dilemma. First, animal welfare is not always considered, implicating discomfort or even worse, suffering to animals involved. Secondly, revisions of manuscripts are sometimes done without taking into account ethical and regulatory aspects concerning the use of animals. Underestimation of pain or suffering, disregard for physiological parameters, and other examples recently reported in scientific journals by neuroscientists from all over the world are discussed in this article. In a period of great debate about the ethical use of animals, with society being involved and engaged in the discussion, this Neuro-Opinion intends to call the attention of researchers, ethical committee members, and journal editors about the need of strictly endorsing international regulations and placing animal welfare as the top priority.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 AR)
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
ETHICAL ISSUES
dc.subject
JOURNAL EDITORS
dc.subject
ETHICAL COMMITTEES
dc.subject
ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS
dc.title
Conducting and reporting animal experimentation: Quo vadis?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-10-23T14:41:31Z
dc.journal.pagination
1-6
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Diaz, Silvina Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. Eduardo de Robertis". Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia; Argentina
dc.journal.title
European Journal Of Neuroscience
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ejn.14091
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14091
Archivos asociados