Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Ferré, Luis Bernardo  
dc.contributor.author
Chitwood, J.L.  
dc.contributor.author
Fresno, C.  
dc.contributor.author
Ortega, Hugo Hector  
dc.contributor.author
Kjelland, M.E.  
dc.contributor.author
Ross, P.J.  
dc.date.available
2019-10-19T15:05:22Z  
dc.date.issued
2018-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Ferré, Luis Bernardo; Chitwood, J.L.; Fresno, C.; Ortega, Hugo Hector; Kjelland, M.E.; et al.; Effect of different mini-volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer-assisted semen analyzer; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Reproduction in Domestic Animals; 53; 1; 2-2018; 26-33  
dc.identifier.issn
0936-6768  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/86537  
dc.description.abstract
Straws of sex-sorted sperm are usually packaged at a low concentration (e.g., ~2.1 × 106 sperm/ml) and cost significantly more than unsorted conventional semen from the same sire. In order to maximize the efficiency of using sex-sorted sperm under in vitro fertilization conditions, the selection of an appropriate sperm separation technique is essential. In this study, the effect of using different silane-coated silica colloid dilutions and layering configurations during centrifugation of sex-sorted sperm was examined over an extended period of incubation time. Sperm recovery and viability after centrifugation using the colloid separation technique were measured along with several sperm motility parameters using CASA. For this purpose, frozen and thawed sex-sorted sperm samples were centrifuged using mini-volume single-layer (40%, 60% and 80%) and mini-volume two-layer (45%/90%, 40%/80% and 30%/60%) separation configurations using PureSperm®. A single layer of 40% PureSperm® recovered significantly more sex-sorted sperm (78.07% ± 2.28%) followed by a single layer of 80% PureSperm® (68.43% ± 2.33%). The lowest sperm recovery was obtained using a two-layer PureSperm® dilution of 45%/90% (47.57% ± 2.33%). Single-layer centrifugation recovered more sorted sperm (68.67% ± 1.74%) than two layer (53.74% ± 1.74%) (p <.0001). A single layer of 80% PureSperm® exhibited the highest sorted sperm viability (72.01% ± 2.90%) after centrifugation (p <.05). The mini-volume single layer of 80% PureSperm® was determined to be an effective alternative to a two-layer centrifugation configuration for sex-sorted sperm selection. In addition, single-layer colloid dilution of 80% performed either as well as or significantly outperformed the other treatments, as well as the control, with regard to motility (MOT) for all time periods of analysis.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
SEX-SORTED SPERM  
dc.subject
SINGLE-LAYER CENTRIFUGATION  
dc.subject
SPERM RECOVERY  
dc.subject
SPERM SELECTION  
dc.subject
SPERM VIABILITY  
dc.subject
TWO-LAYER CENTRIFUGATION  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Effect of different mini-volume colloid centrifugation configurations on flow cytometrically sorted sperm recovery efficiency and quality using a computer-assisted semen analyzer  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-10-18T18:37:04Z  
dc.journal.volume
53  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
26-33  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ferré, Luis Bernardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Chitwood, J.L.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fresno, C.. National Institute Of Genomic Medicine (inmegen); México  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ortega, Hugo Hector. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kjelland, M.E.. Genetics And Biotech, Llc;  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ross, P.J.. University of California at Davis; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Reproduction in Domestic Animals  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rda.13048