Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Lábaque, María Carla  
dc.contributor.author
Martella, Monica Beatriz  
dc.contributor.author
Maestri, Damian  
dc.contributor.author
Navarro, Joaquin Luis  
dc.date.available
2016-11-03T21:36:28Z  
dc.date.issued
2013-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Lábaque, María Carla; Martella, Monica Beatriz; Maestri, Damian; Navarro, Joaquin Luis; The influence of diet composition on egg and chick traits in captive Greater Rhea females; Taylor & Francis; British Poultry Science; 54; 3; 1-2013; 347-380  
dc.identifier.issn
0007-1668  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/7963  
dc.description.abstract
1. This study was conducted to evaluate the influence of diet composition on egg number,physical and chemical characteristics of eggs and weight and survival of chicks throughout a breeding season in a captive-bred population of greater rheas (Rhea americana). 2. From August to December, individuals were offered two diets: processed feed for rheas and processed feed for chicken (which is the feed most commonly offered to farmed rheas in Argentina). Reproductive performance of 15 females was monitored and female body weight was recorded before egg-laying onset. Within each experimental group, the following variables were determined: egg morphometric variables and percentage of components, fatty acid composition, hatching success and initial weight of chicks andmortality during the first week of life. 3. Females that were fed on processed feed for rheas delayed onset of laying and reduced laying period and number of eggs produced. However, females of this group laid larger eggs, with higher percentages of yolk and yolk lipids, and exhibited higher hatching success and chick weight compared with those that received chicken diet. Survivorship of chicks in their first week of life was not affected by composition of the diet offered to parental female. 4. Some reproductive parameters of captive greater rhea females fed on processed feed for rheas were higher than those of individuals receiving processed feed for chicken.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Diet  
dc.subject
Egg  
dc.subject
Chick  
dc.subject
Ratite  
dc.subject.classification
Ecología  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
The influence of diet composition on egg and chick traits in captive Greater Rhea females  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2016-11-02T18:12:00Z  
dc.journal.volume
54  
dc.journal.number
3  
dc.journal.pagination
347-380  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lábaque, María Carla. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas y Tecnológicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martella, Monica Beatriz. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Cs.exactas Fisicas y Naturales. Centro de Zoologia Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Cordoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecologia Animal; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maestri, Damian. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Navarro, Joaquin Luis. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Cs.exactas Fisicas y Naturales. Centro de Zoologia Aplicada; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Centro Cientifico Tecnologico Cordoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecologia Animal; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
British Poultry Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00071668.2013.791965  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.791965