Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Constantino, Michael J.
dc.contributor.author
Coyne, Alice
dc.contributor.author
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín
dc.date.available
2019-04-30T15:34:46Z
dc.date.issued
2017-09
dc.identifier.citation
Constantino, Michael J.; Coyne, Alice; Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín; Contextualized integration as a common playing field for clinicians and researchers: Comment on McWilliams; American Psychological Association Inc.; Journal of Psychotherapy Integration; 27; 3; 9-2017; 296-303
dc.identifier.issn
1573-3696
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75340
dc.description.abstract
We comment on McWilliams's (2016) article, "Integrative Research for Integrative Practice: A Plea for Respectful Collaboration Across Clinician and Researcher Roles." Above all, we appreciate McWilliams's well-toned plea for considerate collaboration between researchers and clinicians. We also appreciate that obstacles have long made it difficult to meaningfully reduce the scientist-practitioner chasm, and McWilliams shrewdly highlights how some obstacles are becoming even more daunting to traverse. In general, we agreed with most of McWilliams's points. We also provide some respectful challenges or at least extensions or reframes. For example, to us, the researcher-practitioner divide is more than just an urgent conversation problem; rather, it has potential to do harm to patients. Also, although we too appreciate relational factors in the psychotherapy evidence base, it seems important to refrain from contributing to the artificial relational-specific factor dichotomy. We present a resolution of this divide, which we call content-responsive psychotherapy integration (Constantino, Boswell, Bernecker, & Castonguay, 2013). We also offer possible versions of efficient and immediately translational trainings, arguing against continued self- or peernominated experts passing down wisdom in long-form in-services. Similarly, while we champion hearing from "reputable" clinicians about important research topics, we believe that the determination of reputable needs to be based on clinicians' personal outcomes data. We also argue that it is important to move beyond the 4 established integration pathways by pushing for disruptive integrative innovations. Ultimately, our goal is to help locate the common playing field for researchers and clinicians and the most efficient ways to play together on it.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
American Psychological Association Inc.
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Context-Responsive Psychotherapy Integration
dc.subject
Evidence-Based Practice
dc.subject
Practice-Based Evidence
dc.subject
Science-Practice Integration
dc.subject.classification
Psicología
dc.subject.classification
Psicología
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES
dc.title
Contextualized integration as a common playing field for clinicians and researchers: Comment on McWilliams
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-04-29T14:10:55Z
dc.journal.volume
27
dc.journal.number
3
dc.journal.pagination
296-303
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
dc.journal.ciudad
Nueva York
dc.description.fil
Fil: Constantino, Michael J.. University Of Massachusetts; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Coyne, Alice. University Of Massachusetts; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal of Psychotherapy Integration
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/int0000067
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fint0000067
Archivos asociados