Artículo
Comparative Plasma Exposure and Lung Distribution of Two Human Use Commercial Azithromycin Formulations Assessed in Murine Model: A Preclinical Study
Rivulgo, Virginia Margarita
; Sparo, Mónica; Ceci, Mónica; Fumuso, Elida; Confalonieri, Alejandra
; Delpech, Gastón
; Sanchez Bruni, Sergio Fabian
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38730/38730bb70a6f45b157dcb344651cce28fc82aea9" alt="Icon"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38730/38730bb70a6f45b157dcb344651cce28fc82aea9" alt="Icon"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38730/38730bb70a6f45b157dcb344651cce28fc82aea9" alt="Icon"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38730/38730bb70a6f45b157dcb344651cce28fc82aea9" alt="Icon"
Fecha de publicación:
09/2013
Editorial:
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Revista:
Biomed Central International
ISSN:
2314-6141
Idioma:
Inglés
Tipo de recurso:
Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Resumen
Azithromycin(AZM)therapeutic failure and relapses of patients treated with generic -35 formulations have been observed in clinical practice.The main goal of this research was 36 to compare in a pre-clinical study the serum exposure and lung tissue concentrationof 37 two commercial formulations AZM-based in murine model. The current study involved 38 264 healthy Balb-C.Mice were divided in two groups (n=44): Animals of Group A 39 (Reference Formulation ?R-) were orally treated with AZM suspension at 10 mg/kg of 40 b.w.Experimental animals of Group B (Generic formulation ?G-) received identical 41 treatment than Group A with a generic formulation AZM-based.The study was repeated 42 twice as Phase II and III. Serum and lung tissue samples were taken 24 hpost treatment.43 Validated microbiological assay was used to determine the serum pharmacokinetic and 44 lung distribution of AZM.45 After the pharmacokinetic analysis was observed a similar serum exposure for both46 formulations of AZM assayed. In contrast, statistical differences (p< 0.001)were 47 obtained after comparing the concentrations of both formulations in lung tissue, being48 the values obtained for AUC and Cmax (AZM-R-)+1586 and 122%respectively,than 49 those obtained for AZM-G-in lung. These differences may indicate large differences on 50 the distribution process of both formulations, which may explain the lack of 51 efficacy/therapeutic failure observed on clinical practice.
Palabras clave:
Azithromycin
,
Generics
,
Mice
,
Lung
,
Pharmacokinetics
Archivos asociados
Licencia
Identificadores
Colecciones
Articulos(CCT - TANDIL)
Articulos de CTRO CIENTIFICO TECNOLOGICO CONICET - TANDIL
Articulos de CTRO CIENTIFICO TECNOLOGICO CONICET - TANDIL
Articulos(CIVETAN)
Articulos de CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION VETERINARIA DE TANDIL
Articulos de CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION VETERINARIA DE TANDIL
Citación
Rivulgo, Virginia Margarita; Sparo, Mónica; Ceci, Mónica; Fumuso, Elida; Confalonieri, Alejandra; et al.; Comparative Plasma Exposure and Lung Distribution of Two Human Use Commercial Azithromycin Formulations Assessed in Murine Model: A Preclinical Study; Hindawi Publishing Corporation; Biomed Central International; 2013; 9-2013; 392010-392010
Compartir
Altmétricas