Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Dos Santos, Daniel Andrés
dc.contributor.author
Molineri, Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Reynaga, Maria Celina
dc.contributor.author
Basualdo, Carola Viviana
dc.date.available
2019-03-19T00:12:52Z
dc.date.issued
2011-01
dc.identifier.citation
Dos Santos, Daniel Andrés; Molineri, Carlos; Reynaga, Maria Celina; Basualdo, Carola Viviana; Which index is the best to assess stream health?; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 11; 2; 1-2011; 582-589
dc.identifier.issn
1470-160X
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71983
dc.description.abstract
Biotic indices are widely used in monitoring the health status of various ecosystems. The choice of the best index is generally done qualitatively depending on a variety of aspects including cost and time. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) methodology constitutes a valuable tool to compare objectively the diagnostic capabilities of different tests in addition to obtain decision thresholds. In this manuscript, ROC methodology is described and implemented for the first time in the context of stream bioassessment through benthic macroinvertebrates. Cut-off values that distinguish impaired from healthy sites are suggested. A new index called IBY-4 is also developed. IBY-4 accounts for the occurrence of Megaloptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera and Elmidae in a target site and may achieve the best general performance in the study region concerning to Andean Tropical streams.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
dc.subject
BIOTIC INDEX
dc.subject
BMWP
dc.subject
EPT
dc.subject
ROC METHODOLOGY
dc.subject
YUNGAS
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
Which index is the best to assess stream health?
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-03-15T20:01:54Z
dc.journal.volume
11
dc.journal.number
2
dc.journal.pagination
582-589
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dos Santos, Daniel Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Molineri, Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Reynaga, Maria Celina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Basualdo, Carola Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Ecological Indicators
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.08.004
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X1000141X
Archivos asociados