Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Dos Santos, Daniel Andrés  
dc.contributor.author
Molineri, Carlos  
dc.contributor.author
Reynaga, Maria Celina  
dc.contributor.author
Basualdo, Carola Viviana  
dc.date.available
2019-03-19T00:12:52Z  
dc.date.issued
2011-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Dos Santos, Daniel Andrés; Molineri, Carlos; Reynaga, Maria Celina; Basualdo, Carola Viviana; Which index is the best to assess stream health?; Elsevier Science; Ecological Indicators; 11; 2; 1-2011; 582-589  
dc.identifier.issn
1470-160X  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71983  
dc.description.abstract
Biotic indices are widely used in monitoring the health status of various ecosystems. The choice of the best index is generally done qualitatively depending on a variety of aspects including cost and time. ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) methodology constitutes a valuable tool to compare objectively the diagnostic capabilities of different tests in addition to obtain decision thresholds. In this manuscript, ROC methodology is described and implemented for the first time in the context of stream bioassessment through benthic macroinvertebrates. Cut-off values that distinguish impaired from healthy sites are suggested. A new index called IBY-4 is also developed. IBY-4 accounts for the occurrence of Megaloptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera and Elmidae in a target site and may achieve the best general performance in the study region concerning to Andean Tropical streams.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES  
dc.subject
BIOTIC INDEX  
dc.subject
BMWP  
dc.subject
EPT  
dc.subject
ROC METHODOLOGY  
dc.subject
YUNGAS  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Which index is the best to assess stream health?  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-03-15T20:01:54Z  
dc.journal.volume
11  
dc.journal.number
2  
dc.journal.pagination
582-589  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dos Santos, Daniel Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Molineri, Carlos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Reynaga, Maria Celina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Basualdo, Carola Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán. Unidad Ejecutora Lillo; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Ecological Indicators  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.08.004  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X1000141X