Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
García Gibson, Francisco
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2019-03-18T20:07:28Z
dc.date.issued
2016-01
dc.identifier.citation
García Gibson, Francisco; Utopias and comparative assessments of justice; Blackwell Publishing Ltd; Metaphilosophy; 47; 1; 1-2016; 92-107
dc.identifier.issn
1467-9973
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71928
dc.description.abstract
When we make public policy choices, is it helpful to know how utopia (that is, the perfectly just institutional design) would look? Amartya Sen argues that it is neither necessary, nor sufficient, nor even contributory. He claims that before making a policy choice one should compare several feasible institutional designs to see which promotes justice most (a "comparative assessment" of justice), and that it is misleading to use the perfect design as a standard in those comparisons. Principles of justice are the proper standard. The present article contends that the perfect design has nevertheless an important role to play in the prior task of identifying and refining our principles of justice. It also shows that the perfect design - in at least one sense of this term - may be a legitimate long-term goal for present policy choices.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Amartya Sen
dc.subject
Comparative Assessments
dc.subject
Justice
dc.subject
Utopia
dc.subject.classification
Estudios Religiosos
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
Utopias and comparative assessments of justice
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-03-13T17:40:40Z
dc.journal.volume
47
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
92-107
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.description.fil
Fil: García Gibson, Francisco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Metaphilosophy
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/meta.12172
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12172
Archivos asociados