Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Suarez, Romina Paula  
dc.contributor.author
María Elena, Zaccagnini  
dc.contributor.author
Babbitt, Kimberly J.  
dc.contributor.author
Calamari, Noela C.  
dc.contributor.author
Natale, Guillermo Sebastian  
dc.contributor.author
Cerezo, Alexis  
dc.contributor.author
Codugnello, Nadia Beatriz  
dc.contributor.author
Boca, Teresa  
dc.contributor.author
Damonte, Maria Jimena  
dc.contributor.author
Vera Candioti, Josefina  
dc.contributor.author
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio  
dc.date.available
2019-03-07T20:08:27Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Suarez, Romina Paula; María Elena, Zaccagnini; Babbitt, Kimberly J.; Calamari, Noela C.; Natale, Guillermo Sebastian; et al.; Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina; Springer; Landscape Ecology; 31; 10; 12-2016; 2485-2505  
dc.identifier.issn
0921-2973  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/71205  
dc.description.abstract
Context: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales. Methods: We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models. Results: Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes. Conclusions: Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Agriculture Expansion And Intensification  
dc.subject
Amphibian Conservation  
dc.subject
Entre Rios  
dc.subject
Espinal  
dc.subject
Forest Connectivity  
dc.subject
Habitat Loss  
dc.subject
Landscape Heterogeneity  
dc.subject
Landscape Structure  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-02-25T18:47:34Z  
dc.journal.volume
31  
dc.journal.number
10  
dc.journal.pagination
2485-2505  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.journal.ciudad
Berlin  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Suarez, Romina Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: María Elena, Zaccagnini. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Babbitt, Kimberly J.. University of New Hampshire; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Calamari, Noela C.. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Paraná; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Natale, Guillermo Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Química; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Cerezo, Alexis. Asociación Aves Argentinas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Codugnello, Nadia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas. Laboratorio de Ecología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Boca, Teresa. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas. Laboratorio de Ecología; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Damonte, Maria Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vera Candioti, Josefina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Venado Tuerto; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro de Investigación de Recursos Naturales. Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Landscape Ecology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2