Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
dc.contributor.author
Tohmé, Fernando Abel
dc.date.available
2019-02-04T14:53:59Z
dc.date.issued
2009-12
dc.identifier.citation
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Tohmé, Fernando Abel; Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack; Elsevier Science; Journal of Applied Logic; 7; 4; 12-2009; 403-420
dc.identifier.issn
1570-8683
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/69262
dc.description.abstract
The problems that arise from the presence of self-attacking arguments and odd-length cycles of attack within argumentation frameworks are widely recognized in the literature on defeasible argumentation. This paper introduces two simple semantics to capture different intuitions about what kinds of arguments should become justified in such scenarios. These semantics are modeled upon two extensions of argumentation frameworks, which we call sustainable and tolerant. Each one is constructed on the common ground of the powerful concept of admissibility introduced by Dung in [P.M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence 77 (1995) 321-357]. The novelty of this approach consists in viewing the admissibility of a subset of arguments as relative to potentially challenging subsets of arguments. Both sustainable and tolerant semantics are more credulous than preferred semantics (i.e. they justify at least the same arguments, and possibly more). Given certain sufficient conditions they coincide among them as well as with other semantics introduced by Dung.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Argumentation Frameworks
dc.subject
Credulous Semantics
dc.subject
Game-Theory
dc.subject
Lottery Paradox
dc.subject
Odd-Length Cycles of Attack
dc.subject
Self-Attacking Arguments
dc.subject.classification
Estudios Religiosos
dc.subject.classification
Filosofía, Ética y Religión
dc.subject.classification
HUMANIDADES
dc.title
Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2019-01-23T17:50:55Z
dc.journal.volume
7
dc.journal.number
4
dc.journal.pagination
403-420
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Tohmé, Fernando Abel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades. Centro de Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal of Applied Logic
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S157086830800027X
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.012
Archivos asociados