Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Isla, Maria Ines  
dc.contributor.author
Salas, Ana Lilia  
dc.contributor.author
Danert, Fátima Carolina  
dc.contributor.author
Zampini, Iris Catiana  
dc.contributor.author
Ordóñez, Roxana Mabel  
dc.date.available
2016-08-02T18:41:57Z  
dc.date.issued
2014-02-07  
dc.identifier.citation
Isla, Maria Ines; Salas, Ana Lilia; Danert, Fátima Carolina; Zampini, Iris Catiana; Ordóñez, Roxana Mabel; Analytical methodology optimization to estimate the content of non-flavonoid phenolic compounds in Argentine propolis extracts; Taylor & Francis; Pharmaceutical Biology; 52; 7; 7-2-2014; 835-840  
dc.identifier.issn
1388-0209  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6872  
dc.description.abstract
Context: Traditionally, the content of total phenolics (flavonoid phenolics (FP) and nonflavonoid phenolics (NFP)) and flavonoids (flavone/flavonol and flavonone/dihydroflavonol)in propolis has been determined by different methodologies. Until now, the percentage of total phenolic (TP) compounds that corresponds to FP and NFP, expressed in the same units by a spectrophotometric method, has not been determined. Objective: The current study proposes a quick and simple methodology that separates FP and NFP in propolis samples and determines TP, FP, and NFP by the same method. Materials and methods: Propolis samples from five Argentine provinces (Tucuma´n, Santiago del Estero, Salta, Misiones, and Jujuy) were used. Extraction of TP from the propolis samples was carried out by maceration with 80% ethanol and quantified by Folin?Ciocalteu reagent (FC-R). Then, FP was precipitated with formaldehyde in acid medium. After centrifugation, NFP were determined in the supernatant using FC-R. FP content was calculated as the difference between the content of TP and NFP. The method was also validated using commercial flavonoids and chalcones. Results: FP recovery in all experiments was between 85.95% and 98.29%. Propolis from Tucuman had significantly higher amounts of total phenols than propolis from other provinces. SE5 showed higher content of FP (81.52%) followed by SA1 (74.75%). The propolis from TUC4, SA4, SE3, and MI showed the lowest FP content and highest content of NFP. Conclusions: This method provides a simple, reliable, and specific spectrophotometric assay to estimate the content of NFP, FP, and TP in propolis samples.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Propolis  
dc.subject
Flavonoid Phenolic Precipitation  
dc.subject
Total Phenolic Compounds Content  
dc.subject
Determination of Phenolic Non Flavonoides  
dc.subject.classification
Química Orgánica  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Analytical methodology optimization to estimate the content of non-flavonoid phenolic compounds in Argentine propolis extracts  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2016-07-25T19:31:59Z  
dc.journal.volume
52  
dc.journal.number
7  
dc.journal.pagination
835-840  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Isla, Maria Ines. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Salas, Ana Lilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Danert, Fátima Carolina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Zampini, Iris Catiana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ordóñez, Roxana Mabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán. Instituto de Quimica del Noroeste; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Bioquímica, Química y Farmacia; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Pharmaceutical Biology  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3109/13880209.2013.871638  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.871638  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pmid/24920228  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/13880209.2013.871638?journalCode=iphb20#.V6CoT2VXui4