Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Sede, Silvana Mabel  
dc.contributor.author
Nicola, Marcela Viviana  
dc.contributor.author
Pozner, Raúl Ernesto  
dc.contributor.author
Johnson, Leigh  
dc.date.available
2019-01-24T20:00:33Z  
dc.date.issued
2012-06  
dc.identifier.citation
Sede, Silvana Mabel; Nicola, Marcela Viviana; Pozner, Raúl Ernesto; Johnson, Leigh; Phylogeography and palaeodistribution modelling in the Patagonian steppe: The case of Mulinum spinosum (Apiaceae); Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Biogeography; 39; 6; 6-2012; 1041-1057  
dc.identifier.issn
0305-0270  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/68548  
dc.description.abstract
Aim An integrative study of the endemic, yet ubiquitous, Patagonian shrub Mulinum spinosum (Apiaceae) was performed: (1) to assess the historical processes that influenced its geographical pattern of genetic variation; (2) to test hypotheses of its survival in situ or in glacial refugia during glacial cycles; and (3) to model its extant and palaeoclimatic distributions to assess support for the phylogeographical patterns recovered. Location Chilean and Argentinian Andean region and Patagonian steppe. Methods Chloroplast DNA sequences, trnH-psbA, trnS-trnG and 3′trnV-ndhC, were obtained for 314 individuals of M. spinosum from 71 populations. The haplotype data matrix was analysed using nested clade analysis (NCA) to construct a network. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA), spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) and neutrality tests were also used to test for genetic structure and range expansion in the species. The present potential geographical distribution of M. spinosum was modelled and projected onto a Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) model. Results Amongst the 29 haplotypes observed, one was widely distributed, but most were restricted to either northern or southern regions. The populations with highest haplotype diversity were found in southern Patagonia, the high Andean region, and northern Patagonia. AMOVA and SAMOVA showed latitudinal structure for Argentinian populations. NCA implied patterns of restricted gene flow or dispersal but with some long-distance dispersal and also long-distance colonization and/or past fragmentation. Neutrality tests did not support range expansions. The current distribution model was a fairly good representation of the extant geographical distribution of the species, and the distribution model for the LGM did not show important shifts of the extant range to lower latitudes, except for a shift towards the palaeoseashore. Main conclusions Based on agreement amongst phylogeographical patterns, distribution of genetic variability, equivocal evidence of putative refugia and palaeodistribution modelling, it is probable that glaciations did not greatly affect the distribution of Mulinum spinosum. Our results are consistent with the in situ survival hypothesis, and not with the latitudinal migration of plant communities to avoid adverse climate conditions during Pleistocene glaciations. It is possible that populations of northern Patagonia may have been isolated from the southern ones by the Chubut and Deseado basins.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Distribution Modelling  
dc.subject
Last Glacial Maximum  
dc.subject
Mulinum Spinosum  
dc.subject
Neneo  
dc.subject
Patagonian Steppe  
dc.subject
Phylogeography  
dc.subject
Southern South America  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Phylogeography and palaeodistribution modelling in the Patagonian steppe: The case of Mulinum spinosum (Apiaceae)  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2019-01-24T18:51:06Z  
dc.journal.volume
39  
dc.journal.number
6  
dc.journal.pagination
1041-1057  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sede, Silvana Mabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nicola, Marcela Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pozner, Raúl Ernesto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Johnson, Leigh. University Brigham Young; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Biogeography  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02662.x  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02662.x