Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
dc.contributor.author
García, Alejandro Javier
dc.contributor.author
Kern Isberner, Gabriele
dc.contributor.author
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
dc.date.available
2018-12-26T21:00:48Z
dc.date.issued
2011-03
dc.identifier.citation
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; García, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 26; 1; 3-2011; 35-43
dc.identifier.issn
0269-8889
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67010
dc.description.abstract
Research on the relation between Belief Revision and Argumentation has always been fruitful in both directions: some argumentation formalisms can be used to define belief change operators,and belief change techniques have also been used for modeling the dynamics of beliefs in argumentation formalisms. In this paper, we give a historical perspective on how belief revision has evolved in the last three decades, and how it has been combined with argumentation. First, we will recall the foundational works concerning the links between both areas. On the basis of such insights, we will present a conceptual view on this topic and some further developments. We offer a glimpse into the future of research in this area based on the understanding of argumentation and belief revision as complementary, mutually useful disciplines.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Cambridge University Press
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Belief Revision
dc.subject
Argumentation
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Computación e Información
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS
dc.title
On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-12-20T18:16:35Z
dc.journal.volume
26
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
35-43
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
dc.journal.ciudad
Cambridge
dc.description.fil
Fil: Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Kern Isberner, Gabriele. Universitat Dortmund; Alemania
dc.description.fil
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Knowledge Engineering Review
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888910000391
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/on-the-evolving-relation-between-belief-revision-and-argumentation/B64E02F11785717579CE0DA94E993BA2
Archivos asociados