Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Dennis, R. W. James  
dc.contributor.author
Malcolm, Jay R.  
dc.contributor.author
Smith, Sandy M.  
dc.contributor.author
Bellocq, Maria Isabel  
dc.date.available
2018-11-27T13:52:17Z  
dc.date.issued
2018-09  
dc.identifier.citation
Dennis, R. W. James; Malcolm, Jay R.; Smith, Sandy M.; Bellocq, Maria Isabel; Response of saproxylic insect communities to logging history, tree species, stage of decay, and wood posture in the central Nearctic boreal forest; Northeast Forestry University; Journal of Forestry Research; 29; 5; 9-2018; 1365-1377  
dc.identifier.issn
1993-0607  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65274  
dc.description.abstract
Saproxylic insect assemblages are essential functional components of forest ecosystems that can be affected by forest management. We used a split-plot ANOVA design to analyze differences in selected saproxylic insects (all arthropod orders and dipteran and parasitic hymenopteran families) emerging from dead wood of sites with different logging histories (horse-logged, mechanically-logged and unlogged), tree species (Populus and Picea), stage of decay (early- and late-decay stages) and posture (standing and downed logs) in the boreal forest of central Canada. No clear effects of logging history were seen for the studied taxa; however, interaction between logging history and other dead wood features was apparent. Cecidomyiidae consistently emerged more from Populus than from Picea dead wood. Most of the studied saproxylic families were more abundant in late-decay than in early-decay wood. Dipterans of the Cecidomyiidae, Ceratopogonidae, Empididae, Mycetophilidae and Sciaridae families, and hymenopterans of the Diapriidae and Ichneumonidae families were significantly more abundant in downed than in standing dead wood. In contrast, Mymaridae was most abundant in standing dead wood. Our study provides evidence that some insects at high taxonomic levels respond differently to dead wood quality, and this could inform future management strategies in the boreal forest for the conservation of saproxylic fauna and their ecological functions.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Northeast Forestry University  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Boreal Forest  
dc.subject
Dead Wood Quality  
dc.subject
Forest Harvesting  
dc.subject
High-Level Taxa  
dc.subject
Saproxylic Insects  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Response of saproxylic insect communities to logging history, tree species, stage of decay, and wood posture in the central Nearctic boreal forest  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-10-23T18:33:57Z  
dc.journal.volume
29  
dc.journal.number
5  
dc.journal.pagination
1365-1377  
dc.journal.pais
China  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Dennis, R. W. James. University of Toronto; Canadá  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Malcolm, Jay R.. University of Toronto; Canadá  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Smith, Sandy M.. University of Toronto; Canadá  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Bellocq, Maria Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Forestry Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0543-z  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11676-017-0543-z