Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Taylor, Kimberley T.  
dc.contributor.author
Maxwell, Bruce D.  
dc.contributor.author
Pauchard, Aníbal  
dc.contributor.author
Nuñez, Martin Andres  
dc.contributor.author
Peltzer, Duane A.  
dc.contributor.author
Terwei, André  
dc.contributor.author
Rew, Lisa J.  
dc.date.available
2018-09-24T19:00:48Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-01  
dc.identifier.citation
Taylor, Kimberley T.; Maxwell, Bruce D.; Pauchard, Aníbal; Nuñez, Martin Andres; Peltzer, Duane A.; et al.; Drivers of plant invasion vary globally: Evidence from pine invasions within six ecoregions; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Global Ecology and Biogeography; 25; 1; 1-2016; 96-106  
dc.identifier.issn
1466-822X  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60803  
dc.description.abstract
Aim: To determine biotic and abiotic controls on pine invasion globally within six ecoregions that include both introduced and native ranges. Locations: Río Negro province, Argentina; Aysén and Araucanía regions, Chile; South Island (two ecoregions), New Zealand; Greater Yellowstone ecosystem, USA. Methods: We quantified tree abundance and size across invasion fronts of the widespread invasive tree species Pinus contorta at each of the nine sites, encompassing both the native and introduced range. We also determined the relative importance of propagule pressure, abiotic characteristics and biotic factors for invasion success. Finally, key plant population metrics such as individual tree growth rates and reproductive effort were compared between native and introduced ranges. Results: Pinus contorta density decreased with increasing distance from source population in all cases, but the importance and shape of this relationship differed among sites due, primarily to biotic factors. For example, areas dominated by native southern beech forest (Fuscospora cliffortioides or Nothofagus spp.) were not invaded, and this biotic resistance was not overcome by high propagule pressure. In contrast, shrublands were more highly invaded than grasslands, contradicting previous generalizations about pine invasions. Pinus contorta growth was faster, age to maturity was earlier and reproductive effort was higher in the introduced ranges compared with the native range, suggesting a demographic shift towards more rapid population growth in introduced regions. Climatic differences between the ranges may explain, at least in part, the observed pattern. Main conclusions: We demonstrate that although biological invasions are driven by propagule pressure across different ecoregions, these processes interact strongly with biotic factors. Intriguingly, our results suggest that propagule pressure may become less important than biotic interactions as invasions proceed. Multi-region studies including both the native and introduced ranges provide unparalleled opportunities for understanding how these interactions change among regions as invasions proceed.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Biogeography  
dc.subject
Biological Invasions  
dc.subject
Biotic Resistance  
dc.subject
New Zealand  
dc.subject
Non-Native Tree Invasion  
dc.subject
Patagonia  
dc.subject
Pinus Contorta  
dc.subject
Propagule Pressure  
dc.subject
Tree Population Dynamics  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Biológicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Drivers of plant invasion vary globally: Evidence from pine invasions within six ecoregions  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-09-24T13:52:57Z  
dc.journal.volume
25  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
96-106  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Taylor, Kimberley T.. State University of Montana; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Maxwell, Bruce D.. State University of Montana; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pauchard, Aníbal. Universidad de Concepción; Chile  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nuñez, Martin Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Peltzer, Duane A.. Crown Research Institutes. Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Terwei, André. Universidad de Concepción; Chile. Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity; Chile  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rew, Lisa J.. State University of Montana; Estados Unidos  
dc.journal.title
Global Ecology and Biogeography  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12391  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.12391