Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Faccendini, Pablo Luis  
dc.contributor.author
Ribone, María Élida  
dc.contributor.author
Lagier, Claudia Marina  
dc.date.available
2016-06-02T18:35:54Z  
dc.date.issued
2014-02  
dc.identifier.citation
Faccendini, Pablo Luis; Ribone, María Élida; Lagier, Claudia Marina; Selective application of two rapid, low-cost electrochemical methods to quantify glycerol according to the sample nature; Elsevier; Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical; 193; 2-2014; 142-148  
dc.identifier.issn
0925-4005  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/6010  
dc.description.abstract
The selection of the method to quantify glycerol largely depends on the amount present in the sample, the matrix nature where glycerol has to be determined, and the potential interferences accompanying the analyte. We compared different electrochemical methods to determine glycerol in terms of convenience, from the point of view of the sample nature, the time spent to accomplish the analysis, the preferably use of green consumables, the limit of detection (LD), and the operational cost. We studied two alternative methodologies based on amperometric measurements to determine glycerol. In aqueous media, we use the versatile gold electrode, being the linear range 2.5 × 10−5 to 2.0 × 10−3 M, and the LD 10 μM (3 × SDb, standard deviation of the blank). In extremely complex matrixes, where many electroactive species are expected to be present, we propose to use a new approach based on biosensor technology, which takes advantage of an inexpensive, soluble redox mediator, and uses only one enzyme with its cofactor in solution. The substrate was a glassy carbon paste electrode; the system used the enzyme glycerol dehydrogenase, soluble NAD+ as cofactor, and ferricyanide as charge mediator. The response showed to be linear between 7.0 × 10−5 and 1.8 × 10−3 M, and the LD was 20 μM. The biosensor displayed more than two month stability without the enzyme losing activity when kept dried at 4 °C. The time taken to complete the analysis was 10 min, counting from the moment the sample was taken until the signal was recorded. The operational cost of the whole analysis was less than that derived of using other biosensors or a spectrophotometric assay.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Biosensores  
dc.subject
Glicerol  
dc.subject
Amperometría  
dc.subject.classification
Química Analítica  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
Selective application of two rapid, low-cost electrochemical methods to quantify glycerol according to the sample nature  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2016-06-01T13:36:23Z  
dc.journal.volume
193  
dc.journal.pagination
142-148  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Faccendini, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Rosario. Instituto de Química Rosario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ribone, María Élida. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Rosario. Instituto de Química Rosario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lagier, Claudia Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Rosario. Instituto de Química Rosario; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925400513014263  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.076  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.076