Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Glujovsky, Demian
dc.contributor.author
Sueldo, Carlos
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.contributor.author
Borghi, Carolina
dc.contributor.author
Nicotra, Pamela
dc.contributor.author
Andreucci, Sara
dc.contributor.author
Ciapponi, Agustín
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2018-07-25T16:11:43Z
dc.date.issued
2016-05
dc.identifier.citation
Glujovsky, Demian; Sueldo, Carlos; Borghi, Carolina; Nicotra, Pamela; Andreucci, Sara; et al.; Misleading reporting and interpretation of results in major infertility journals; Elsevier Science Inc; Fertility and Sterility; 105; 5; 5-2016; 1301-1306
dc.identifier.issn
0015-0282
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/53081
dc.description.abstract
Objective To evaluate the proportion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in top infertility journals indexed on PubMed that reported their results with proper effect estimates and their precision estimation, while correctly interpreting both measures. Design Cross-sectional study evaluating all the RCTs published in top infertility journals during 2014. Setting Not applicable. Patient(s) Not applicable. Intervention(s) Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s) Proportion of RCTs that reported both relative and absolute effect size measures and its precision. Result(s) Among the 32 RCTs published in 2014 in the top infertility journals reviewed, 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1-56.3) did not mention in their abstracts whether the difference among the study arms was statistically or clinically significant, and only 6.3% (95% CI, 0.8-20.8) used a CI of the absolute difference. Similarly, in the results section, these elements were observed in 28.2% (95% CI, 13.7-46.7) and 15.6% (95% CI, 5.3-32.8), respectively. Only one study clearly expressed the minimal clinically important difference in their methods section, but we found related proxies in 53% (95% CI, 34.7-70.9). None of the studies used CIs to draw conclusions about the clinical or statistical significance. We found 13 studies where the interpretation of the findings could be misleading. Conclusion(s) Recommended reporting items are underused in top infertility journals, which could lead to misleading interpretations. Authors, reviewers, and editorial boards should emphasize their use to improve reporting quality.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science Inc
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Absolute Difference
dc.subject
Confidence Intervals
dc.subject
Minimal Clinically Important Difference
dc.subject
P Value
dc.subject
Reporting Quality
dc.subject.classification
Salud Ocupacional
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
Misleading reporting and interpretation of results in major infertility journals
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-07-25T13:57:14Z
dc.journal.volume
105
dc.journal.number
5
dc.journal.pagination
1301-1306
dc.journal.pais
Estados Unidos
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Nueva York
dc.description.fil
Fil: Glujovsky, Demian. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Centro de Reproducción y Genética Humana.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Sueldo, Carlos. Centro de Reproducción y Genética Humana.; Argentina. University of California st San Francisco; Estados Unidos
dc.description.fil
Fil: Borghi, Carolina. Centro de Reproducción y Genética Humana.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nicotra, Pamela. Centro de Reproducción y Genética Humana.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Andreucci, Sara. Centro de Reproducción y Genética Humana.; Argentina
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ciapponi, Agustín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Fertility and Sterility
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.134
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028215023146
Archivos asociados