Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Fragoso, Wallace  
dc.contributor.author
Allegrini, Franco  
dc.contributor.author
Olivieri, Alejandro Cesar  
dc.date.available
2018-07-19T20:46:00Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-08  
dc.identifier.citation
Fragoso, Wallace; Allegrini, Franco; Olivieri, Alejandro Cesar; A new and consistent parameter for measuring the quality of multivariate analytical methods: Generalized analytical sensitivity; Elsevier Science; Analytica Chimica Acta; 933; 8-2016; 43-49  
dc.identifier.issn
0003-2670  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/52715  
dc.description.abstract
Generalized analytical sensitivity (γ) is proposed as a new figure of merit, which can be estimated from a multivariate calibration data set. It can be confidently applied to compare different calibration methodologies, and helps to solve literature inconsistencies on the relationship between classical sensitivity and prediction error. In contrast to the classical plain sensitivity, γ incorporates the noise properties in its definition, and its inverse is well correlated with root mean square errors of prediction in the presence of general noise structures. The proposal is supported by studying simulated and experimental first-order multivariate calibration systems with various models, namely multiple linear regression, principal component regression (PCR) and maximum likelihood PCR (MLPCR). The simulations included instrumental noise of different types: independently and identically distributed (iid), correlated (pink) and proportional noise, while the experimental data carried noise which is clearly non-iid.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Analytical Figures of Merit  
dc.subject
Analytical Sensitivity  
dc.subject
Method Comparison  
dc.subject
Multivariate Calibration  
dc.subject
Sensitivity  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Químicas  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS  
dc.title
A new and consistent parameter for measuring the quality of multivariate analytical methods: Generalized analytical sensitivity  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-07-18T20:47:48Z  
dc.journal.volume
933  
dc.journal.pagination
43-49  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Fragoso, Wallace. Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza. Departamento de Química; Brasil. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Química Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Instituto de Química Rosario; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Allegrini, Franco. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Química Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Instituto de Química Rosario; Argentina. Universidade Federal da Paraíba. Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza. Departamento de Química; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Olivieri, Alejandro Cesar. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Química Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas. Instituto de Química Rosario; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Analytica Chimica Acta  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003267016307851  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.06.022