Repositorio Institucional
Repositorio Institucional
CONICET Digital
  • Inicio
  • EXPLORAR
    • AUTORES
    • DISCIPLINAS
    • COMUNIDADES
  • Estadísticas
  • Novedades
    • Noticias
    • Boletines
  • Ayuda
    • General
    • Datos de investigación
  • Acerca de
    • CONICET Digital
    • Equipo
    • Red Federal
  • Contacto
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
  • INFORMACIÓN GENERAL
  • RESUMEN
  • ESTADISTICAS
 
Artículo

Disproving the validated planets K2-78b, K2-82b, and K2-92b: The importance of independently confirming planetary candidates

Cabrera, J.; Barros, S.C.C.; Armstrong, D.; Hidalgo, D.; Santos, N.C.; Almenara, J.M.; Alonso, R.; Deleuil, M.; Demangeon, O.; Diaz, Rodrigo FernandoIcon ; Lendl, M.; Pfaff, J.; Rauer, H.; Santerne, A.; Serrano, L.M.; Zucker, S.
Fecha de publicación: 10/2017
Editorial: EDP Sciences
Revista: Astronomy and Astrophysics
ISSN: 0004-6361
Idioma: Inglés
Tipo de recurso: Artículo publicado
Clasificación temática:
Astronomía

Resumen

Context. Transiting super-Earths orbiting bright stars in short orbital periods are interesting targets for the study of planetary atmospheres. Aims. While selecting super-Earths suitable for further characterisation from the ground from a list of confirmed and validated exoplanets detected by K2, we found some suspicious cases that led to us reassess the nature of the detected transiting signal. Methods. We performed a photometric analysis of the K2 light curves and centroid motions of the photometric barycenters. Results. Our study shows that the validated planets K2-78b, K2-82b, and K2-92b are not planets, but background eclipsing binaries. The eclipsing binaries are inside the Kepler photometric aperture, but outside the ground-based high-resolution images that were used for validation. Conclusions. We advise extreme care in the validation of candidate planets that are discovered by space missions. It is important that all the assumptions in the validation process are carefully checked. An independent confirmation is mandatory in order to avoid wasting valuable resources on further characterisation of non-existent targets.
Palabras clave: Eclipses , Methods: Data Analysis , Planets And Satellites: Detection , Techniques: Photometric
Ver el registro completo
 
Archivos asociados
Thumbnail
 
Tamaño: 595.3Kb
Formato: PDF
.
Descargar
Licencia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Excepto donde se diga explícitamente, este item se publica bajo la siguiente descripción: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
Identificadores
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51859
URL: http://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731233
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731233
Colecciones
Articulos(IAFE)
Articulos de INST.DE ASTRONOMIA Y FISICA DEL ESPACIO(I)
Citación
Cabrera, J.; Barros, S.C.C.; Armstrong, D.; Hidalgo, D.; Santos, N.C.; et al.; Disproving the validated planets K2-78b, K2-82b, and K2-92b: The importance of independently confirming planetary candidates; EDP Sciences; Astronomy and Astrophysics; 606; A75; 10-2017; 1-4
Compartir
Altmétricas
 

Enviar por e-mail
Separar cada destinatario (hasta 5) con punto y coma.
  • Facebook
  • X Conicet Digital
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Sound Cloud
  • LinkedIn

Los contenidos del CONICET están licenciados bajo Creative Commons Reconocimiento 2.5 Argentina License

https://www.conicet.gov.ar/ - CONICET

Inicio

Explorar

  • Autores
  • Disciplinas
  • Comunidades

Estadísticas

Novedades

  • Noticias
  • Boletines

Ayuda

Acerca de

  • CONICET Digital
  • Equipo
  • Red Federal

Contacto

Godoy Cruz 2290 (C1425FQB) CABA – República Argentina – Tel: +5411 4899-5400 repositorio@conicet.gov.ar
TÉRMINOS Y CONDICIONES