Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Matossian, Brenda  
dc.contributor.author
Vejsbjerg, Laila  
dc.date.available
2018-05-14T13:31:30Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-12  
dc.identifier.citation
Matossian, Brenda; Vejsbjerg, Laila; Mountains and borders, geographical approaches from the South. An Araucanía-North Patagonia case study; Taylor & Francis - Association for Borderlands Studies; Journal of Borderlands Studies; 33; 1; 12-2016; 157-177  
dc.identifier.issn
2159-1229  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/45043  
dc.description.abstract
Argentina and Chile share the third world?s longest international land boundary (5,150 km) delineated by the mountains of the southern section of The Andes. Complex relationships, migratory and commercial exchanges, as well as imaginaries/representations and policies concerning nature conservation and cultural heritage preservation have either divided or brought both countries together, throughout their history as Nation States and neighbors.Argentine and Chilean academics have studied regional borderlands as rather watertight compartments. This tendency to reproduce in the scientific research field the social construction of borders as a limit or division has been modified over the last two decades. Critical and binational studies, from multiple disciplinary perspectives and scales, have explored the transformation of this space shared throughout history. This article collects and systematizes background studies on the Araucanía (Chile) and North Patagonia (Argentina) frontier to identify the main theoretical contributions from Geography and other Social Sciences which have improved debates on space in this borderland. This descriptive research is based on a theoretical and thematic analysis of both recent academic production and activities. Some of the conclusions are: (1) Currently, studies focus on the subjective dimensions of borders. (2) The notion of region as a living space enables us to give center stage to the treatmentof border subnational areas. (3) The notion of scale permits us toconnect power relations to the dialectics nationalism/internationalization, at interregional and intraregional level. (4) The concept of landscape unveils the importance of imaginaries/representations in the processes of territorialization and frontierization.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Taylor & Francis - Association for Borderlands Studies  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Borderland  
dc.subject
Geography  
dc.subject
Patagonia  
dc.subject
Araucania  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Medioambientales  
dc.subject.classification
Geografía Económica y Social  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS SOCIALES  
dc.title
Mountains and borders, geographical approaches from the South. An Araucanía-North Patagonia case study  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-04-27T20:13:03Z  
dc.journal.volume
33  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
157-177  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Abingdon  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Matossian, Brenda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Vejsbjerg, Laila. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Borderlands Studies  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1257363  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08865655.2016.1257363