Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde  
dc.contributor.author
Schindler, Stefan  
dc.contributor.author
Lencinas, María Vanessa  
dc.contributor.author
Peri, Pablo Luis  
dc.contributor.author
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José  
dc.date.available
2018-04-27T19:39:14Z  
dc.date.issued
2016-03  
dc.identifier.citation
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde; Schindler, Stefan; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Peri, Pablo Luis; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 369; 3-2016; 161-169  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-1127  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43739  
dc.description.abstract
Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a metaanalysisof 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retentionharvesting (VR) 1?8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysisis focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, nativespecies of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was toevaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) speciesrichness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alienspecies, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supportedhigher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersedretention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of speciesaffected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants ofhabitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants,although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insectswere reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positiveresponse to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundancecompared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forestspecialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects ofother habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years postharvest.Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness andabundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis showsrecovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alienplants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as amain potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level.Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, butthe influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
RetenciÓN Variable  
dc.subject
Manejo Forestal  
dc.subject
Silvicultura  
dc.subject
Nothofagus Pumilio  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2018-04-27T14:00:42Z  
dc.journal.volume
369  
dc.journal.pagination
161-169  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Schindler, Stefan. Universidad de Viena; Austria. Universidad de Porto; Portugal. Environment Agency Austria; Austria  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Forest Ecology and Management  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561