Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author
Luna, Florencia
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.date.available
2018-03-06T21:21:14Z
dc.date.issued
2015-01
dc.identifier.citation
Luna, Florencia; Medical ethics and more: Ideal theories, non-ideal theories and conscientious objection; B M J Publishing Group; Journal Of Medical Ethics.; 41; 1; 1-2015; 129-133
dc.identifier.issn
0306-6800
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/38098
dc.description.abstract
Doing 'good medical ethics' requires acknowledgment that it is often practised in non-ideal circumstances! In this article I present the distinction between ideal theory (IT) and non-ideal theory (NIT). I show how IT may not be the best solution to tackle problems in non-ideal contexts. I sketch a NIT framework as a useful tool for bioethics and medical ethics and explain how NITs can contribute to policy design in non-ideal circumstances. Different NITs can coexist and be evaluated vis-à-vis the IT. Additionally, I address what an individual doctor ought to do in this non-ideal context with the view that knowledge of NITs can facilitate the decision-making process. NITs help conceptualise problems faced in the context of non-compliance and scarcity in a better and more realistic way. Deciding which policy is optimal in such contexts may influence physicians' decisions regarding their patients. Thus, this analysis-usually identified only with policy making-may also be relevant to medical ethics. Finally, I recognise that this is merely a first step in an unexplored but fundamental theoretical area and that more work needs to be done.
dc.format
application/pdf
dc.language.iso
eng
dc.publisher
B M J Publishing Group
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.subject
Medical Ethics
dc.subject
Conscientious Objection
dc.subject
Ideal Theories
dc.subject
Non Ideal Theories
dc.subject.classification
Salud Ocupacional
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias de la Salud
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS MÉDICAS Y DE LA SALUD
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.title
Medical ethics and more: Ideal theories, non-ideal theories and conscientious objection
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.date.updated
2018-03-02T14:01:14Z
dc.journal.volume
41
dc.journal.number
1
dc.journal.pagination
129-133
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres
dc.description.fil
Fil: Luna, Florencia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales. Sede Académica Argentina Buenos Aires; Argentina
dc.journal.title
Journal Of Medical Ethics.
![Se ha confirmado la validez de este valor de autoridad por un usuario](/themes/CONICETDigital/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102295
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://jme.bmj.com/content/41/1/129
Archivos asociados