Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Pereira, Amalia Luz C.  
dc.contributor.author
Berrocal, Guillermo Jose P.  
dc.contributor.author
Marchetti, Sergio Gustavo  
dc.contributor.author
Albornoz, Alberto  
dc.contributor.author
de Souza, Alexilda O.  
dc.contributor.author
Rangel, Maria do Carmo  
dc.date.available
2018-01-05T18:53:47Z  
dc.date.issued
2007-07-28  
dc.identifier.citation
Albornoz, Alberto; Marchetti, Sergio Gustavo; Rangel, Maria do Carmo; de Souza, Alexilda O.; Berrocal, Guillermo Jose P.; Pereira, Amalia Luz C.; et al.; A comparison between the precipitation and impregnation methods for water-gas shift catalysts; Elsevier Science; Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical; 281; 1-2; 28-7-2007; 66-72  
dc.identifier.issn
1381-1169  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/32424  
dc.description.abstract
The precipitation and impregnation methods in the preparation of chromium-doped magnetite for water gas shift reaction (WGSR) were compared in this work. This reaction is an important step in the commercial production of highly pure hydrogen from natural gas or naphtha feedstocks. It was found that the preparation method affects both the textural and catalytic properties of chromium-doped magnetite. However, chromium was able to preserve the specific surface area during the WGSR and to delay the metallic iron production, independently of the preparation method. Chromium caused a decrease in activity per area, depending on the preparation method. This fact was assigned to its ability in making the production of Fe2+ species more difficult, making the catalytic sites less active, because the redox cycle of the reaction becomes more difficult. The most active catalyst was obtained by adding chromium by impregnation, which led to a large amount of total chromium in the solid and then a catalyst with high specific surface area was produced. It was showed that the catalysts can be prepared in the active phase avoiding the reduction step, before reaction  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Chromium-Doped Magnetite  
dc.subject
Hydrogen  
dc.subject
Wgsr  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ingeniería Química  
dc.subject.classification
Ingeniería Química  
dc.subject.classification
INGENIERÍAS Y TECNOLOGÍAS  
dc.title
A comparison between the precipitation and impregnation methods for water-gas shift catalysts  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2017-07-10T13:23:21Z  
dc.journal.volume
281  
dc.journal.number
1-2  
dc.journal.pagination
66-72  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Pereira, Amalia Luz C.. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Quımica; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Berrocal, Guillermo Jose P.. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Quımica; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Marchetti, Sergio Gustavo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas ; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Albornoz, Alberto. Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientıficas. Centro de Quımica; Venezuela  
dc.description.fil
Fil: de Souza, Alexilda O.. Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia; Brasil  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rangel, Maria do Carmo. Universidade Federal da Bahia. Instituto de Quımica; Brasil  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2007.07.042  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1381116907004645