Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Madoz, Laura Vanina  
dc.contributor.author
Giuliodori, Mauricio Javier  
dc.contributor.author
Migliorisi, Ana Lorena  
dc.contributor.author
Jaureguiberry, María  
dc.contributor.author
de la Sota, Rodolfo Luzbel  
dc.date.available
2017-12-21T18:33:14Z  
dc.date.issued
2014-01  
dc.identifier.citation
de la Sota, Rodolfo Luzbel; Jaureguiberry, María; Migliorisi, Ana Lorena; Giuliodori, Mauricio Javier; Madoz, Laura Vanina; Endometrial cytology, biopsy, and bacteriology for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in grazing dairy cows; Elsevier; Journal of Dairy Science; 97; 1; 1-2014; 195-201  
dc.identifier.issn
0022-0302  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/31247  
dc.description.abstract
The objectives of this study were to assess the agreement between endometrial cytology and uterine biopsy for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis (SEND) in grazing dairy cows, the interobserver agreement of the biopsy’s readings, and the bacterial population isolated from the uterus of cows having SEND. In experiment 1, lactating Holstein cows (n = 44) 31 to 59 d in milk (DIM) at sampling were enrolled. Clinical endometritis was diagnosed by direct evaluation of vaginal discharge and SEND by endometrial cytology evaluation. Two hundred cells per smear were counted to determine the percentage of polymorphonuclear neutrophilic leukocytes (PMNL). Cut-off values used were ≥8% PMNL at ≤33 DIM, ≥6% PMNL at 34 to 47 DIM, and ≥4% PMNL at ≥48 DIM. Biopsies were assessed blindly by 2 observers who categorized them into 4 groups according to their inflammatory changes: none, minimal, moderate, and severe inflammatory changes. Data were analyzed using the kappa coefficient and logistic regression. In experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows (n = 60) 21 to 62 DIM were enrolled. Clinical endometritis and SEND were diagnosed as previously described. Samples were cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria by routine methods of bacteriological testing. Data were analyzed with logistic regression. In experiment 1, little agreement was observed between cytology and biopsy outputs (kappa = 0.151), and strong agreement between the 2 operators (kappa = 0.854). The likelihood of having a normal biopsy (no inflammatory change) was greater for healthy cows than for those having SEND (odds ratio = 13.145). The probability for getting normal uterine tissue decreased 2.1% for every increasing percentage point in PMNL. In experiment 2, no bacteria were isolated from cows with SEND, coagulase-negative staphylococci were commonly isolated from healthy cows, and Trueperella pyogenes was frequently isolated from cows with clinical endometritis. The likelihood of isolating T. pyogenes from uterine samples increased with the percentage of PMNL (odds ratio = 1.100). In conclusion, biopsy showed low agreement with cytology for the diagnosis of SEND. Nevertheless, fertility trials using uterine biopsies to predict pregnancy outcomes are needed to determine its diagnostic usefulness. Finally, bacteriology would not be recommended as a diagnostic tool because no bacteria were isolated from cows with SEND.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
Dairy Cows  
dc.subject
Subclinical Endometritis  
dc.subject
Uterine Biopsy  
dc.subject
Bacteriology  
dc.title
Endometrial cytology, biopsy, and bacteriology for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis in grazing dairy cows  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2017-12-12T18:26:40Z  
dc.journal.volume
97  
dc.journal.number
1  
dc.journal.pagination
195-201  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Madoz, Laura Vanina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Giuliodori, Mauricio Javier. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Migliorisi, Ana Lorena. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Jaureguiberry, María. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: de la Sota, Rodolfo Luzbel. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Journal of Dairy Science  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030213007297  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6836