Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Traversa, María Julia  
dc.contributor.author
Saracco, Mónica  
dc.contributor.author
Estein, Silvia Marcela  
dc.contributor.author
Paolicchi, Fernando Alberto  
dc.contributor.author
Rodriguez, Edgardo Mario  
dc.contributor.author
Jorge, María Cristina  
dc.contributor.other
Petrovski, Kiro Risto  
dc.date.available
2026-01-13T13:05:42Z  
dc.date.issued
2025  
dc.identifier.citation
Traversa, María Julia; Saracco, Mónica; Estein, Silvia Marcela; Paolicchi, Fernando Alberto; Rodriguez, Edgardo Mario; et al.; Flow cytometry standarizationand validation for immunohematology in cattle; IntechOpen; 2025; 1-15  
dc.identifier.isbn
978-1-83635-478-9  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/279406  
dc.description.abstract
Flow cytometry has become the method of choice for studying the immune system and its response in mammals, including cattle. The development of a broad panel of precise monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to bovine leukocyte differentiation molecules now enables a detailed characterization of the immune response in cattle. However, before extending these studies, it is essential to ensure the consistency of laboratory results. Currently, indirect labeling is used in single and multiparameter analysis. This technique introduces a probability of experimental error due to the multiple steps involved in processing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The objective of the chapter is to describe the development and testing strategy for ensuring the reliability of dual-immunolabeling methods for PBMC. We detail the experiments used to define optimal secondary antibody dilutions; set up autofluorescence, nonspecific binding, and gating controls, implement gating strategies, and measure intra-laboratory consistency. Our results show that variation between paired samples was very low, confirming that reliable data can be obtained with careful sample preparation. We propose that incorporating statistical comparisons of repeated immunolabeling of the same samples using the same MAb can serve as an effective strategy for controlling experimental error in routine dual indirect flow cytometry. Defining controls and dilutions, measuring the variation between laboratory results, and controlling experimental error are key steps in the validation process.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
IntechOpen  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CATTLE  
dc.subject
FLOW CYTOMETRY  
dc.subject
IMMUNE RESPONSE CHARACTERIZATION  
dc.subject
CONTROLS  
dc.subject
ASSAY VALIDATION  
dc.subject.classification
Otras Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Flow cytometry standarizationand validation for immunohematology in cattle  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/parte de libro  
dc.date.updated
2026-01-06T14:51:01Z  
dc.journal.pagination
1-15  
dc.journal.pais
Reino Unido  
dc.journal.ciudad
Londres  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Traversa, María Julia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Saracco, Mónica. Hospital Dr. Antonio Centrángolo; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Estein, Silvia Marcela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Paolicchi, Fernando Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rodriguez, Edgardo Mario. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tandil. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil. Provincia de Buenos Aires. Gobernación. Comision de Investigaciones Científicas. Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Jorge, María Cristina. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentina  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/1225971  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1012806  
dc.conicet.paginas
100  
dc.source.titulo
Bovine Medicine-Education and Practice