Global distribution, diversity, and ecological niche of Picozoa, a widespread and enigmatic marine protist lineage

Abstract

Background The backbone of the eukaryotic tree of life contains taxa only found in molecular surveys, of which we still have a limited understanding. Such is the case of Picozoa, an enigmatic lineage of heterotrophic picoeukaryotes within the supergroup Archaeplastida, which has emerged as a signifcant component of marine microbial planktonic communities. To enhance our understanding of the diversity, distribution, and ecology of Picozoa, we conduct a comprehensive assessment at diferent levels, from assemblages to taxa, employing phylogenetic analysis, species distribution modeling, and ecological niche characterization. Results Picozoa was among the ten most abundant eukaryotic groups, found almost exclusively in marine environments. The phylum was represented by 179 Picozoa’s OTU (pOTUs) placed in fve phylogenetic clades. Picozoa community structure had a clear latitudinal pattern, with polar assemblages tending to cluster separately from non-polar ones. Based on the abundance and occupancy pattern, the pOTUs were classifed into four categories: Low-abundant, Widespread, Polar, and Non-polar. We calculated the ecological niche of each of these categories. Notably, pOTUs sharing similar ecological niches were not closely related species, indicating a phylogenetic overdispersion in Picozoa communities. This could be attributed to competitive exclusion and the strong infuence of the seasonal amplitude of variations in environmental factors, such as temperature, shaping physiological and ecological traits. Conclusions Overall, this work advances our understanding of uncharted protists’ evolutionary dynamics and ecological strategies. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the species-level ecology of marine heterofagellates like Picozoa. The observed phylogenetic overdispersion challenges the concept of phylogenetic niche conservatism in protist communities, suggesting that closely related species do not necessarily share similar ecological niches.