Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Giménez, Víctor David  
dc.contributor.author
Serrago, Roman Augusto  
dc.contributor.author
Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela  
dc.contributor.author
Ciampitti, Ignacio A.  
dc.contributor.author
Miralles, Daniel Julio  
dc.date.available
2025-04-04T11:11:49Z  
dc.date.issued
2024-04  
dc.identifier.citation
Giménez, Víctor David; Serrago, Roman Augusto; Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela; Ciampitti, Ignacio A.; Miralles, Daniel Julio; Comparative analysis of wheat and barley yield performance across temperate environments; Elsevier Science; Field Crops Research; 310; 4-2024; 1-9  
dc.identifier.issn
0378-4290  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/258011  
dc.description.abstract
Context: A comparative analysis of grain yield performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under different environments constitutes a way to identify restrictions in yield formation between both crop species. However, most of the previous studies on these field crops have been carried out in Mediterranean environments. Objective: This study aims to compare the grain yield performance of wheat and barley across a wide range of temperate environmental conditions. Methods: Wheat and barley yield databases from the national network of cultivar evaluation of Argentina were assembled. The database included 191 wheat cultivars (with early-, mid- and late-flowering length cycle), 140 barley cultivars, and 44 combinations of sites and years of the Argentine wheat and barley belt region. Average heading date variation among environments and crops was no more than 10 days. Crop grain yield comparisons were carried out using a regression analysis, benchmarking within each site-year the grain yield of each cultivar against the average grain yield of all crop cultivars (i.e., environmental index). Results: There were no differences in grain yield between wheat and barley for all data, but the behavior between crop species changed with the length of the wheat cycle (i.e., early-, mid-, or late-flowering cultivars). Barley portrayed a greater grain yield than early-flowering wheat under low-yielding environments (< 6060 kg ha 1), but this advantage vanished as the yield environment improved. Mid-flowering wheat showed a similar grain yield to barley across temperate environments. Lastly, late-flowering wheat outperformed barley mainly in high-yielding environments (> 6138 kg ha 1). Grain number m 2 was the main numerical component that explained variability in grain yield. The relative contribution of the yield numerical components differed between species, having barley lower grain number m 2 but a greater grain weight than wheat. Conclusions: The comparison of the grain yield performance between species represents a strategy to adjust the rotation system, being a critical factor in considering the variability in the crop growth cycle.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Elsevier Science  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
CROP X ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION  
dc.subject
GRAIN YIELD  
dc.subject
HORDEM VULGARE L.  
dc.subject
TRITICUM AESTIVUM L  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura  
dc.subject.classification
Agricultura, Silvicultura y Pesca  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Comparative analysis of wheat and barley yield performance across temperate environments  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2025-04-03T13:23:24Z  
dc.journal.volume
310  
dc.journal.pagination
1-9  
dc.journal.pais
Países Bajos  
dc.journal.ciudad
Amsterdam  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Giménez, Víctor David. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Serrago, Roman Augusto. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Producción Vegetal. Cátedra de Cerealicultura; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Ciampitti, Ignacio A.. Kansas State University; Estados Unidos  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Miralles, Daniel Julio. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Field Crops Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378429024000923  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109339