Glass wool column filtration for stallion sperm selection: a comparative analysis with the single-layer colloid centrifugation

Abstract

Glass wool column filtration (GWCF) selects human, bull, boar, dog and buffalo spermatozoa, but reports in the horse are scarce. Single-layer colloid centrifugation with Androcoll-E™ is currently the standard procedure to select good-quality equine sperm. This study was designed to assess GWCF (50 and 75 mg columns; GWCF-50 and GWCF-75, respectively) efficacy to select good-quality sperm from fresh and frozen–thawed equine semen, and to compare its performance with Androcoll-E™ colloid centrifugation. Percentage total motile (TM), progressively motile (PM), morphologically normal (MN), osmotically competent (HOS+) and acrosome-intact/osmotically competent (AI/HOS+) sperm were determined. In studies done with fresh semen samples (n = 17), suspensions subjected to GWCF-50 showed an improvement (p < .05) in PM and HOS+ sperm after selection. With GWCF-75, an increase (p < .05) in PM, MN and HOS+ sperm was observed. Results with GWCF were comparable or better than with Androcoll-E™ selection. Sperm recovery was similar between procedures for all semen parameters. Total sperm count recovery was lower after GWCF-75 (GWCF-50 = 60.0; GWCF-75 = 51.0; Androcoll-E™ = 76.0 million sperm; median; p = .013), but results on total progressive sperm count were similar (GWCF-50 = 23.0; GWCF-75 = 27.0; Androcoll-E™ = 24.0 million sperm; median; p = .3850). Using frozen–thawed semen samples (n = 16), an improvement (p < .05) in TM, PM, NM, HOS+ and AI/HOS+ sperm was observed in GWCF-75 filtrates. Results were comparable to Androcoll-E™ centrifugation, except HOS+ that increased (p < .05) only after GWCF-75. Recovery was comparable for all parameters in frozen samples. GWCF is a simple and low-cost procedure that selects equine sperm with a quality comparable to colloid centrifugation with Androcoll-E™.