Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author
Nava, Santiago  
dc.contributor.author
Rossner, Maria Victoria  
dc.contributor.author
Toffaletti, Jose R.  
dc.contributor.author
Da Luz, Miguel Angel  
dc.contributor.author
Rossner, Maria Belen  
dc.contributor.author
Signorini Porchietto, Marcelo Lisandro  
dc.contributor.author
Morel, Nicolas  
dc.date.available
2025-02-12T10:36:09Z  
dc.date.issued
2024-06  
dc.identifier.citation
Nava, Santiago; Rossner, Maria Victoria; Toffaletti, Jose R.; Da Luz, Miguel Angel; Rossner, Maria Belen; et al.; Strategic control of the cattle tick Rhipicephlaus microplus applied to rotational and silvopastoral grazing systems in subtropical areas; Springer; Parasitology Research; 123; 6; 6-2024; 1-9  
dc.identifier.issn
0932-0113  
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/254085  
dc.description.abstract
This work evaluated if strategic control based on no more than three or four annual treatments is useful to control Rhipicephalusmicroplus infestations on cattle when it is applied to intensive rotational grazing and silvopastoral systems withhigh stocking rates in subtropical areas. In the intensive rotational grazing system, three annual treatments with chemicalacaricides were applied on cattle in two different schemes: between spring and early summer and from late winter and latespring. Strategic control based on three treatments with chemical acaricides from late winter to late spring plus an additionalfourth treatment in summer was tested in the silvopastoral system. In the intensive rotational grazing systems, the controlschemes allow to reach a significant reduction in the tick load on cattle considering a time interval from spring to autumn.However, the efficacy levels were not high enough in some specific moments, namely, the tick counts of summer and autumn(there were not significant differences between treated and control groups). The scheme evaluated in the silvopastoral grazingsystem yielded better results than those tested for the intensive rotational system, because significant differences in tickload between treated and control groups were observed in all post-treatment counts and when the analysis was performedfor the whole study period. However, values of efficacy in the count-by-count comparison were disparate, ranging from 64.1to 99.7. Although the efficacy values obtained in the silvopastoral system were better than those of the rotational grazingsystems, the total tick load on treated cattle in autumn was not low enough (mean abundance values 25.14 and 38.14). Tickswere more evenly distributed among hosts in late summer and autumn than in spring or early summer, where few hosts carrymost of the ticks. Some management strategies as intensive rotational systems or silvopastoral structures can lead to a moreefficient forage use, but they imply greater tick challenge than in extensive grazing systems. In these situations, the schemesof strategic control bases on three or four annual treatments should be complemented with additional tactical treatments inlate summer or autumn.  
dc.format
application/pdf  
dc.language.iso
eng  
dc.publisher
Springer  
dc.rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess  
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/  
dc.subject
TICK  
dc.subject
CONTROL  
dc.subject
CATTLE  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
Ciencias Veterinarias  
dc.subject.classification
CIENCIAS AGRÍCOLAS  
dc.title
Strategic control of the cattle tick Rhipicephlaus microplus applied to rotational and silvopastoral grazing systems in subtropical areas  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article  
dc.type
info:ar-repo/semantics/artículo  
dc.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion  
dc.date.updated
2025-02-10T11:15:21Z  
dc.journal.volume
123  
dc.journal.number
6  
dc.journal.pagination
1-9  
dc.journal.pais
Alemania  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Nava, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea. - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rossner, Maria Victoria. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Chaco-Formosa. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Colonia Benítez; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Toffaletti, Jose R.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Chaco-formosa. Estacion Experimental Agropecuaria El Colorado. Agencia de Extension Rural El Colorado.; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Da Luz, Miguel Angel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Misiones. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Cerro Azul; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Rossner, Maria Belen. Universidad del Salvador; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Signorini Porchietto, Marcelo Lisandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea. - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina  
dc.description.fil
Fil: Morel, Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea. - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Santa Fe. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela. Instituto de Investigación de la Cadena Láctea; Argentina  
dc.journal.title
Parasitology Research  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-024-08256-4  
dc.relation.alternativeid
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-024-08256-4